• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Silver Tree Lodge

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

18 Clarence Road South, Weston Super Mare, Avon, BS23 4BN (01934) 625309

Provided and run by:
Mr Neil Bradbury

All Inspections

3 March 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection on 3 March 2015 and this was an unannounced inspection. When Silver Tree Lodge was last inspected in September 2013 there were no breaches of the legal requirements identified.

Silver Tree Lodge provides accommodation and personal care for up to eight people who have learning disabilities or mental health needs. At the time of our inspection there were seven people living at the service.

A registered manager was not in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. A manager was in post who had applied to become the registered manager.

People felt safe and staff knew how to identify and respond to allegations of abuse. The provider had a safeguarding and whistleblowing policy for staff that gave guidance on the identification and reporting of suspected abuse.

People and staff employed at the service felt staffing levels were sufficient and that people’s needs were met. The service had a stable staff team. The provider had a safe recruitment processes in operation.

People received their medicines on time. There were suitable arrangements in place for the ordering and disposal of medicines. Medicines were stored correctly and medicines records had been completed accurately.

People made positive comments about the care and staff at the service. Staff told us they were happy with the level of training provided and felt supported through a regular supervision process. An induction period was undertaken by new staff when they commenced employment.

Staff understood their obligations under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and training had been provided. The manager was aware of their legal responsibilities in regard to the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and had obtained advice when required from the local authority in relation to applications. We have made a recommendation to the provider about the implementation of a DoLS policy.

There were reviews of people’s health and people could see healthcare professionals when required.

Staff at the service were caring towards people and people were involved in the planning of their care and support. People’s support records reflected people’s involvement and the decisions made in their care planning.

Support provided to people met their needs. Supporting records highlighted what was important to people and how to support them if they became anxious and displayed behaviour that may be challenging. The provider had a complaints procedure and people felt confident they could speak with staff about matters of concern.

People and staff spoke positively about the manager and communication with staff was regular through meetings. An auditing system to monitor the service provision and safety was in operation.

17 September 2013

During a routine inspection

We saw staff supported people in respectful ways and upheld each person's dignity at all times. There were seven people at the service at the time of our inspection. We observed and talked to staff, talked with people and looked at care records.

People told us they had good relationships with staff. People made positive comments about staff. One person told us that staff were "really nice and kind".

People told us they were "happy living here" and "like it here". One person told us they liked "shopping and walking around town", whilst another person told us they "like being in the garden".

People told us that they felt safe living at this service, and were encouraged to talk to staff if they had any concerns. The service ensured that everyone knew how to complain if they needed to.

The manager showed us the audit system that was in place. We saw it was designed to monitor the quality of the service provided and ensured people were kept safe at all times.

25 March 2013

During a routine inspection

People who lived in the home told us they made decisions about their day to day lives and about the care and support provided to them. One person said 'I choose what time I get up and go to bed. I can choose what I want to eat and what to do during the day.'

People were encouraged to participate in all aspects of home life. Their independence was encouraged and supported. They accessed a range of educational, social and leisure activities. Some people accessed the community without staff support.

People said they were very well cared for. One person said "I like the staff. They help me when I need help.' They felt safe living in the home. People knew who to speak to if they were worried or upset. One person said 'I will tell the staff if I'm unhappy or if I get angry.'

People we spoke with said that they liked the staff who supported them. The home was staffed during the day and at night. One person said 'Staff are here all the time. Staff sleep in as well.'

People who lived in the home told us staff asked them if they were happy. Regular house meetings were held. People knew they could speak with staff if they were unhappy about any aspect of their care or the home more generally. No concerns were raised with us during our inspection. People said they liked living at the home.

The provider had various systems in place designed to monitor the quality of the service provided to people and to ensure people were safe.

14 September 2011

During a routine inspection

We observed people discussing the activities they were planning to do that day with memebers of staff. One person told us about the cleaning they were going to that morning and the football match they had planned for later that day.

We observed people being helped to do things for themselves such as preparing to go to community events.We were told by one person that although members of staff are attentive and supportive, "they encourage me to do as much as I can for myself ". People said that they were able to get up in the morning and go to bed at night when it suited them. Three people were still in bed when we arrived at 9am.

We spoke to one person who told us that a member of staff had advised them to have some early lunch before they went out in the afternoon. This person told us about the group they enjoyed attending called ' Freedom and Control' and how they enjoyed visiting the local library to use the internet facilities.

We observed one person cleaning their room with the support of a staff member. This person appeared very relaxed and at ease in the presence of the staff member. We observed that the staff member staff was calm and patient and used motivational skills to support and encourage this person to clean their room.

We met and spoke to some of the people who were living in the home. We were told 'They look after me well and help me. One person said 'I used to hate it here when ' lived here but they have now moved out so I feel much happier and relaxed'. 'Everything is alright and I am happy' and 'I need a lot of help and the staff are always willing to help me'.We observed that this person looked relaxed and comfortable with the staff and the surroundings.

We observed the interactions between the support staff and the people they were looking after. We found the staff to be attentive and caring. Those staff we spoke with during our visit were able to tell us about people's needs, their likes and dislikes.

During our visit we found that people living in the home are protected from abuse or the risk of abuse because the staff team have an awareness of safeguarding issues and would respond appropriately if concerns were raised. However, we found that staff were unclear when they should notify us about incidents that affect or potentially affect the wellbeing of people living in the home.

We also found a gap in information for staff to follow about deprivation of liberties and furthermore there was no records confirming that discussions had taken place to enure that some restrictive practices that affected all the people living in the home, such as locking the kitchen door when not in use, is in the best interest of all of the people living in the home.