• Care Home
  • Care home

Gate Lodge

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1 Upper Woodcote Village, Purley, Surrey, CR8 3HE (020) 8668 7286

Provided and run by:
Mr & Mrs P Chellun

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 29 June 2023

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2008.

As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.

Inspection team

The inspection was undertaken by one inspector.

Service and service type

Gate Lodge is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing and/or personal care as a single package under 1 contractual agreement dependent on their registration with us. Gate Lodge is a care home with nursing care. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

Registered Manager

The service is required to have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Registered managers and providers are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

At the time of our inspection there was not a registered manager in post. The service had a new manager who is in the process of registering with the Care Quality Commission. This means the provider is legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection

We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because we needed to be sure that the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection.

What we did before the inspection

Prior to the inspection we reviewed the information we held about the service, including statutory notifications received. We used all this information to plan our inspection. The provider was not asked to complete a Provider Information Return (PIR) prior to this inspection. A PIR is information providers send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.

During the inspection

We spoke with 6 of the people who used the service about their experiences of the care provided. We spoke with 2 visiting health professionals, 4 members of staff, the manager and the nominated individual. The nominated individual is responsible for supervising the management of the service on behalf of the provider. We reviewed a range of records. This included people's care records and needs / risk assessments. We looked at 3 staff files to check safe recruitment was followed. We also reviewed a variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures, training and quality audits. We spoke with 6 relatives and we continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found and reviewed additional management records sent.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 29 June 2023

About the service

Gate Lodge is a residential care home providing personal or nursing care to up to 19 adults. The service provides support for older adults living with dementia. Gate Lodge is an adapted building in a residential area of Purley. The home had a lift to assist people in accessing the upper floor of the home. There was an accessible garden to an outside area with seating. At the time of our inspection there were 17 people living at the service.

People's experience of using this service and what we found

People were supported to have maximum choice and control over their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were kept safe. Staff knew how to raise safeguarding concerns and how to report them appropriately. Risks to people were identified as part of the assessment and care planning procedure. Risk management strategies were in place to assist staff to manage these risks and to identify triggers for behaviours that may challenge, for people they were supporting.

There were sufficient numbers of staff to meet people's needs.

People received their medicines in a safe manner. Staff received appropriate training and medicine competencies were assessed to ensure staff followed safe guidance.

Staff received a wide range of training to ensure they had the skills and knowledge to support people safely. Staff told us they also received regular formal and informal support in their supervision with the manager.

People's dietary needs were being met, and they had access to healthcare services where needed.

People were supported by staff in a kind and caring way. Staff knew the people well and care records which were well maintained and easy to access, detailed people's preferences, likes and dislikes. People had access to social activities that met their interests and needs.

A complaints procedure was available and displayed to enable people to access it if they or their relatives had a need to do so.

People received personalised care and support to meet their needs and wishes.

People using the service, relatives and staff were given the opportunity to provide feedback on the service. Regular comprehensive auditing took place to ensure the quality of the service was maintained.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at the last inspection and update

The last rating for the service was good [published February 2020].

Why we inspected

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.