• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Mereside Residential Home for People with Learning Disabilities

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

42 St Bernards Road, Olton, Solihull, West Midlands, B92 7BB (0121) 707 6760

Provided and run by:
T Eyton

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

7 June 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on Wednesday 7 June 2017 and was unannounced. The home was rated 'good' at our previous inspection visit on 5 January 2015, and has remained a good service.

The service is family run home for a maximum of 15 people who have learning disabilities and/or autism. At the time of our visit, there were 14 people who lived in the home. The provider was also the registered manager.

A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People felt safe living at Mereside. Staff understood how to protect people from harm, and provided good support to reduce identified risks. There were enough staff available to meet people's needs, and staff recruitment procedures meant staff did not work at the home unless robust checks had been undertaken.

People and staff got on well with each other. People and relatives thought staff were very supportive and caring. People's privacy and dignity was upheld, and staff respected people's wishes. Family and friends were welcomed to visit the home at any time.

People enjoyed their meals and the choices available to them. They were encouraged to be involved, when possible, in the preparation and cooking of food.

Staff received training and support to provide effective care for people. Medicines were managed safely and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards were in place where required.

People were encouraged to be as independent as they could be, and were supported to be involved in work and leisure activities that suited their needs. People were involved in decisions about their care and support. Care and support records provided good information about people's needs, likes and dislikes.

People, relatives and staff thought the management of the home were approachable and responsive to their needs. They could informally or formally approach management with concerns or issues for discussion. No formal complaints had been made.

There were effective management systems to assure people were safe and quality care was provided.

5 January 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 5 January 2015. It was an unannounced inspection.

Mereside Residential Home provides residential care to people who have a learning disability. It is registered to provide care for 15 people. The home has three floors and these floors are currently only accessible by stairs. The provider is in the process of installing a lift within the home which will make it easier for people to access all parts of the home as their mobility needs change. At the time of our inspection there were 15 people living at Mereside Residential Home.

Mereside Residential Home has a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with us to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People who live at the home and staff told us people were safe. There were systems and processes in place to protect people from the risk of harm. These included thorough staff recruitment, staff training and systems for protecting people against risks of abuse.

People told us staff were respectful towards them and staff were caring and supportive to people throughout our visit.

People told us there were enough suitably trained staff to meet their individual care needs. We saw staff spent time with people and provided assistance to people who needed it. Staff were available to support people to go on trips or visits within the local and wider community.

Staff understood they needed to respect people’s choice and decisions if they had the capacity to do so. Assessments had been made and reviewed about people’s individual capacity to make certain care decisions. Where people did not have capacity, decisions were taken in ‘their best interest’ with the involvement of family members where appropriate and relevant health care professionals. This meant the provider was adhering to the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

The provider was meeting their requirements set out in the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). At the time of this inspection, no applications had been authorised under DoLS for people’s freedoms and liberties to be restricted. The registered manager was aware of the impact of a court judgement on the implementation of DoLS and was in the process of making applications to the appropriate bodies to make sure people continued to receive the appropriate levels of support.

People’s health and social care needs had been appropriately assessed. Care plans provided detailed information for staff to help them provide the individual care people required. Identified risks associated with people’s care had been assessed and plans were in place to minimise the potential risks to people.

There was a procedure in place for managing medicines safely.

There were effective systems in place to monitor and improve the quality of service through feedback from people who used the service, staff meetings and a programme of audits and checks.

17 December 2013

During a routine inspection

During our visit to Mereside we spoke with eight people who lived in the home, a visiting relative, three members of staff and the manager. We also observed the care and support being provided to people.

Each person had a personalised care plan which provided staff with information about how they were to assist people in areas where a need for support had been identified. Staff had a good knowledge of the people they were supporting. A visiting relative we spoke with told us they were happy with the care their family member received, saying, 'Tom (the manager) and the staff are amazing.'

We saw staff talking with people in a friendly, familiar and respectful manner. People appeared comfortable and at ease with staff. Staff we spoke with understood the importance of ensuring they had people's consent before providing care and support.

We were satisfied medicines were handled appropriately and people received their medicines as prescribed.

There were processes in place to safely recruit staff and provide staff with the training and support to meet the care needs of people.

There were monitoring processes in place to check the quality of service provided. We saw there had been a relative's survey completed in February 2013. The responses had been positive about the care and support people received.

5 February 2013

During a routine inspection

We visited Mereside on 5 February 2013. Nobody knew we would be visiting. There were 13 people living at the home at the time of our visit. We spoke with 10 of the people who lived there and spent time observing how staff supported people. We spoke with the two deputy managers and two members of staff.

There was a relaxed and friendly atmosphere within the home. On the day of our visit, all but two people attended either a day centre, work placement or college. Some people told us they were attending another activity outside the home that evening.

We saw that people had care plans in place detailing their care needs and how staff were to support them. Risk assessments had been completed and control measures put in place to minimise any risks to people's health and wellbeing.

During our visit we observed that there appeared to be sufficient numbers of staff on duty to meet people's needs. There was a stable staff team with varying levels of staff experience.

Staff we spoke with were aware of their responsibilities to keep people safe.

The service had a complaints policy. We saw that complaints were taken seriously and responded to appropriately within set timescales.

1 December 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

When we visited Mereside one person told us that she was "very happy" in her home. Another person said that the staff were "very nice". Another person was very proud of a new ground floor room in an extension to the building. Some of their families had written positive comments in a survey. One said: "the family all consider Mereside to be home from home. We are happy with the love and care shown."