• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Thornley Leazes Care

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Thornley Leazes, Allendale, Hexham, Northumberland, NE47 9NH (01434) 683769

Provided and run by:
Ms Linda Charlton

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 11 September 2019

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team

The inspection was carried out by one inspector and one Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Service and service type

Thornley Leazes Care is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. The provider also operates a domiciliary care service from the premises. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes.

The service had two managers registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection

This inspection was unannounced. We visited the care home on 15, 20 and 22 August 2019. We visited people receiving care at home on 20 August 2019.

What we did before the inspection

We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We contacted the local authority safeguarding and commissioning teams, local infection control lead for care homes and Healthwatch. Healthwatch is an independent consumer champion that gathers and represents the views of the public about health and social care services in England. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We used all this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We spoke with 16 people who used the service and nine relatives. We also spoke with a district nurse and care manager. We spoke with various members of staff including, the provider, two registered managers and eight care staff.

We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.

We reviewed a range of records. This included eight people’s care records and multiple medication records. We looked at three staff files in relation to recruitment. A variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures were reviewed.

After the inspection

We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We looked at training data and quality assurance records. We contacted the local fire authority, an occupational therapist and a care manager. Where we received responses, we used this information to further add to our judgement of the inspection.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 11 September 2019

About the service

Thornley Leazes Care is a residential care home providing personal care for up to 12 older people, some of whom had learning disabilities and others who lived with dementia. There were 12 people living at the service during the inspection. The service also operated a domiciliary care service out of the same building and they supported 19 people in the local community.

Thornley Leazes Care accommodates 12 people in a two-storey building. The service continued to work towards the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent. The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

Staff followed infection control procedures. Overall medicines were managed well and the provider was reviewing paperwork in connection with this.

People continued to receive good care and were supported with kindness and compassion. Staff knew people well and provided support which met people’s needs and enabled them to take part in activities within the home and community in line with their preferences.

People felt safe and staff knew how to protect them from harm. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Various paperwork, particularly in the home care element of the service required some improvements to ensure it was always robust and up to date. Quality checks were in place and were in the process of being reviewed. We have made a recommendation in connection with these.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good overall (published 22 February 2017). Improvements were required in the well- led key question and this continued to be the case.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.