• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Cherwell Care Services Limited - 50 Bucknell Road

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

50 Bucknell Road, Bicester, Oxfordshire, OX26 2DG (01869) 243839

Provided and run by:
Cherwell Care Services Limited

All Inspections

9 June 2016

During a routine inspection

We inspected Cherwell Care Services on 09 June 2016. The inspection was announced. Cherwell Care Services is a domiciliary care agency in Bicester that provides care to people in their own homes in and around Oxfordshire. At the time of this inspection, the agency was supporting 55 people.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager worked closely with a director of operations.

Staff had a good knowledge of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). The MCA provides a legal framework to assess people’s capacity to make certain decisions, at a certain time. However, the registered manager was not clear on their responsibilities to ensure the service completed their own mental capacity assessments if it was thought a person may lack the capacity to make certain decisions. Where people were thought to lack capacity, assessments in relation to their capacity assessments had not been completed in line with the principles of MCA.

We recommend the registered manager seeks support from a reputable source around the MCA codes of practice.

People who used the service felt safe. The staff had a clear understanding of how to safeguard people and protect them from harm. Staff understood their responsibilities to report any suspected abuse. People and staff were confident they could raise any concerns and these would be dealt with. The provider had systems in place to manage and support safe administration of medicines. The service had sufficient numbers of suitably qualified staff to meet people’s needs.

People had a range of individualised risk assessments in place to keep them safe and to help them maintain their independence. Where required, staff involved a range of other professionals in people’s care.

People’s needs were assessed and care plans enabled staff to understand how to support people. Changes in people’s needs were identified through regular reviews. People's interests and preferences were discussed during assessments and these were used to plan their care. The service was flexible and responded positively to people’s requests.

People felt supported by competent staff. Staff benefitted from regular supervision (one to one meetings with their line manager) and yearly appraisals to reflect on their practice and develop their skills. Staff received training specific to people’s needs.

People and their relatives described the staff as good and providing very good care. People felt they were treated with kindness and their privacy and dignity were always respected. Staff had developed positive relationships with people.

The registered manager informed us of all notifiable incidents. The service had quality assurances in place. The registered manager had a clear plan to develop and improve the service. Staff spoke positively about the management and direction they had from the registered manager.

The registered manager had a clear vision for the service which was shared throughout the staff team. The vision was promoting independence and allowing people to live a safe normal life in their homes. This was embedded within staff practices and evidenced through people’s care plans. Staff felt supported by the registered manager and the provider.

Leadership within the service was open and transparent at all levels. The provider had systems to enable people and their relatives to provide feedback on the support they received. The feedback was acted upon when required.

15 August 2013

During a routine inspection

At the time of our visit there were 70 people using the service. Cherwell Care Services Limited employed 30 care workers.

We spoke with 13 people who used the service and two relatives. Everyone we spoke with said they were happy with the service. One said "they are very good, I have no complaints". Another said "the girls are very caring and very kind". One relative said "I am very happy with the care my daughter receives. The service is excellent".

We spoke with four care workers. All the care workers said they were happy in their role and that they felt well trained and supported. One said "We get supervisions. I find them useful and it helps us improve". Another said "I really enjoy working here. I had induction training and we get regular refresher training. It gives me confidence to do my job well".

We looked at care plans, training records, audits and care worker files and found them to be well maintained and up to date. We found that people were respected and involved in their care and that they were safe from abuse, or the risk of abuse. Care workers were well trained and supported and the manager measured the quality of service and responded to peoples' needs and preferences.

We found the service to be caring, safe, effective, responsive to peoples' needs and well led.

30 July 2012

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with were positive about the quality of the care they received. People told us that they knew who to contact within the agency and that staff were well trained and knowledgeable about their care needs.

People told us that they had a choice in who provided their care and could request a change if care was not being given in the way they wanted.

People we spoke with told us that their care was regularly reviewed and that if there were problems they were confident that the manager would investigate them. People told us that they would be listened to and that action would be taken if they had a complaint or concern.

27 October 2011

During a routine inspection

People, we spoke to, told us that the agency was mostly reliable. Sometimes carers were late due to over running at the previous visit. People told us that this was not usually a problem as the agency informed them if a carer was going to be very late. People said that they felt involved with the way care was given.

People told us that carers were kind and caring and that they were able to meet their needs. People also said that senior staff from the agency visited their homes, unannounced, and checked that the carers were doing what they were required to do. They also checked their uniforms and that they had their identification badge with them.

People receiving care services, were asked about the quality and reliability of the agency from time to time. People, we spoke to, knew who to contact if there were problems and how to make a complaint. Some of the people, we spoke to, told us that, where they had care provided by another agency in the past, they compared Cherwell Care as being as good as, or better, than the previous agency.