• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Myrtle Healthcare

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Southbridge House, Southbridge Place, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 4HA

Provided and run by:
Myrtle Healthcare Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 3 February 2023

The inspection

We carried out this performance review and assessment under Section 46 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act). We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements of the regulations associated with the Act and looked at the quality of the service to provide a rating.

Unlike our standard approach to assessing performance, we did not physically visit the office of the location. This is a new approach we have introduced to reviewing and assessing performance of some care at home providers. Instead of visiting the office location we use technology such as electronic file sharing and video or phone calls to engage with people using the service and staff.

Inspection team

This inspection was undertaken by one inspector.

Service and service type

This service is both a domiciliary care agency (DCA) and a supported living service (SLS). The DCA can provide personal care to people living in their own homes. However, this part of the service was not active at the time of our inspection.

The SLS provides care and support to people to enable them to live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.

Registered Manager

This provider is required to have a registered manager to oversee the delivery of regulated activities at this location. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Registered managers and providers are legally responsible for how the service is run, for the quality and safety of the care provided and compliance with regulations.

At the time of our inspection there was a registered manager in post.

Notice of inspection

In line with our new approach we gave short period notice of this inspection and explained what was involved under the new methodology.

Inspection activity started on 18 January 2023 and ended on 20 January 2023.

What we did before the inspection

We reviewed information we had received about the service since it registered with us. The provider was not asked to complete a Provider Information Return (PIR) prior to this inspection. A PIR is information providers send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We used all this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We spoke with the relative of the person receiving care, 2 care workers and the registered manager. We reviewed records relating to the person’s care and support, medicines administration, staff recruitment, staff training and supervision and records relating to the management of the service. We also reviewed a selection of the provider’s policies.

This performance review and assessment was carried out without a visit to the location’s office. We used technology such as video calls to enable us to engage with people using the service and staff, and electronic file sharing to enable us to review documentation.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 3 February 2023

About the service

Myrtle Healthcare provides community based personal care to people in their own homes. This includes a domiciliary service providing care at home support as well as a supported living service. At the time of our inspection the domiciliary service was not active. The supported living service could accommodate 4 people who have mental health needs, a learning disability and/or autism. At the time of our inspection 1 person was receiving support with their personal care. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

Right Support: People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Staff supported people to be as independent as possible and encouraged them to develop their independent daily living skills. People were supported by staff to pursue their interests and to achieve their aspirations and goals. Staff supported people with their medicines.

Right Care: Staff promoted equality and diversity in their support for people. They understood people’s cultural needs and provided culturally appropriate care. People received kind and compassionate care. Staff protected and respected people’s privacy and dignity. They understood and responded to their individual needs. Staff understood how to protect people from poor care and abuse. The service worked well with other agencies to do so. Staff had training on how to recognise and report abuse and they knew how to apply it. The service had enough appropriately skilled staff to meet people’s needs and keep them safe. Staff assessed risks people might face. Where appropriate, staff encouraged and enabled people to take positive risks.

Right Culture: Staff knew and understood people well and were responsive, supporting their aspirations to live a quality life of their choosing. People and those important to them, were involved in planning their care. The service enabled people and those important to them to work with staff to develop the service. Staff valued and acted upon people’s views. People’s quality of life was enhanced by the service’s culture of improvement and inclusivity.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

This service was registered with us on 7 April 2021 and this is the first inspection.

Why we inspected

This inspection was prompted by a review of the information we held about this service.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.