• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Pure Sports Medicine Limited (Threadneedle)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

41-47 Threadneedle Street, London, EC2R 8AR 0844 770 0800

Provided and run by:
Pure Sports Medicine Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Pure Sports Medicine Limited (Threadneedle) on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Pure Sports Medicine Limited (Threadneedle), you can give feedback on this service.

5 May 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Pure Sports Medicine (Threadneedle) on 5 May 2022 as part of our inspection programme.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of regulated activities and services and these are set out in and of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

Pure Sports Medicine (Threadneedle) is part of a group of medical clinics situated within London providing treatment for people with musculoskeletal conditions and sports injuries, including rheumatological problems.

The clinic provides a range of services (mainly for adults) centred around a multi-disciplinary approach to patient care, including appointments with consultants in Sport and Exercise Medicine (SEM consultants) and Rheumatology and a doctor led COVID-19 rehabilitation service and concussion clinic. Other services include physiotherapy, chiropractic, osteopathy, podiatry, massage therapy, Pilates, occupational therapy, diet and nutrition and physiological and lifestyle assessments. Services such as physiotherapy, chiropractic, osteopathy, podiatry, massage therapy, Pilates and occupational therapy are not within CQC’s scope of registration. Therefore, we did not inspect or report on these services. This inspection focused on the services provided by the SEM Consultants, Rheumatology Consultants, a doctor led COVID-19 rehabilitation service for patients with prolonged fatigue and reduced exercise tolerance and a doctor led concussion clinic for management of concussion and its associated conditions.

The Practice Manager is the Registered Manager. A Registered Manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • Staff had been trained with the skills and knowledge to deliver safe care and treatment. Clinical staff were aware of current evidence-based guidance.
  • Information about the range of services and fees were available.
  • Complaints information was displayed in the clinics.
  • The service conducted quality improvement activity to improve patient outcomes.
  • The service gave patients the ability to view their treatment plan online via secure access.
  • There was a system in place to receive safety alerts issued by government departments such as the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
  • Patient feedback was used to improve services provided.
  • Clinical information with other relevant healthcare providers was shared in a timely manner (subject to patient consent).
  • Staff told us that they were happy to work for the service.
  • The service had an administrative governance structure in place, which was adhered to through a range of policies and procedures which were regularly reviewed.
  • There was a clear vision and strategy, along with a strong governance framework in place which includes all key policies and guidance.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Action all the recommendations following the infection prevention and control audit and Disability Access Risk Assessment.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

19 September 2013

During a routine inspection

Pure Sports Medicine provided a specialist service by doctors and therapists for sports injuries and musculoskeletal conditions. We were able to speak with one patient who said, 'it is a very good service. I was given lots of exercises to do and a diagram to take home. I had clear instructions. It is an excellent service.' One patient from the last patient survey left the comment, 'excellent service. Friendly and professional.'

People were asked for their consent before they received care and treatment and the provider acted in accordance with their wishes. People experienced care, treatment and support that met their needs. Their care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual assessment.

Medicines were handled appropriately and safely administered by clinicians. The provider had taken steps to provide care in an environment that was suitably designed and adequately maintained. People were protected from the risks of unsafe or inappropriate care and treatment because accurate and appropriate records were maintained

9 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with one person using the service on the day of our inspection. This person told us they had used the service previously and their positive experience at that time had encouraged them to return for treatment on this occasion. This person told us their physiotherapist always asked about their progress and any changes to their condition at the beginning of each appointment. This person told us that the service always provided them with written information about their treatment plan and guidance about exercises they should do between each appointment.

We looked at the provider's website and saw that this contained testimonials from patients about their experience of the service. Feedback included positive comment about the way in which consultation and treatment was carried out.

19 October 2011

During a routine inspection

We looked at the clinic's latest annual patient survey results. These were very positive with 82 per cent describing their experience as 'excellent'. The survey asked people about accessing the service, the information and explanations they received, the environment, and the helpfulness of staff and practitioners. The results were positive for all aspects. This picture was confirmed by our own observations and interviews during the inspection. One patient we spoke with during the inspection said "It is an amazing service."