• Care Home
  • Care home

Amber Lodge Nursing Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

684-686 Osmaston Road, Osmaston Road, Derby, DE24 8GT (01332) 740740

Provided and run by:
Rosmead Healthcare Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 9 to 15 December 2025. This service is a care home providing personal and nursing care for adults of all ages, some who may be living with dementia or physical disabilities. The home is registered for 40 people. At the time of our assessment 35 people lived at Amber Lodge Nursing Home.

This focussed assessment was carried out to follow up on the breaches of regulation found at our last assessment. We assessed a small number of quality statements from the safe, effective and well-led key questions and found areas of good practice. The scores for these areas have been combined with scores based on the key question ratings from the last assessment. The service had made improvements and are no longer in breach of regulations. All key questions are now rated as ‘Good’.

Incidents were now used to learn where further improvements could be made. Staff were encouraged to report any concerns so they could be reviewed and used to develop good practice.

People now received good support to eat and drink well. Information on people’s dietary needs and any risks had been clearly identified and communicated to staff.

People were now supported by confident and competent staff when they were assisted to transfer positions, including when they needed to use equipment, such as a hoist to do so.

There were enough staff to provide care to people. Staff were attentive to people and involved them in decisions about their care.

People’s care plans and risk assessments were up to date and reflected their care needs and contained enough information to ensure people received safe and effective care.

People were asked for their consent and could choose from a variety of meal options. Risks to people’s health were monitored to help promote positive health outcomes for people. For example, their weight was monitored to ensure they maintained a healthy weight. The staff team worked well together and supported people to live healthier lives.

Information was known on people’s life histories, preferences and communication needs. People were treated with kindness, empathy and compassion and staff respected their privacy and responded to people’s immediate needs. Staff were positive about the support they received from the leadership team. However, not everyone felt happy with how people were supported to maintain their personal appearance. People told us their choices were sometimes affected by whether staff were available to help them.

People’s communication needs were known, and they received the services they needed from other health and social care organisations. People and staff were asked for their views on the quality and safety of the service and their feedback was listened to. Their home was accessible and adapted to their healthcare needs. Advance care planning was in place to help ensure people’s needs would be met in the future. People told us the availability of staff sometimes affected whether they received person-centred care.

The provider was focussed on continuous learning and improvement. The leadership team were viewed as caring and capable and staff felt respected and confident to raise any concerns should they need to. They worked with other health and social care professionals and incorporated their feedback into on-going improvement plans.

Records of people’s health and care needs were up to date and accurate. Leaders had developed systems that monitored the quality and safety of the service well. They reinforced good practice and gave staff clear support and guidance to help the service perform well.

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 3 to 11 June 2025. This service is a care home providing personal and nursing care for adults of all ages, some who may be living with dementia or physical disabilities. At the time of our inspection 37 people lived at Amber Lodge Nursing Home.

We found 2 breaches of the legal regulations in relation to people’s safe care and treatment and good governance.

Not all incidents were reported so they could be reviewed and not all risks in the environment, including infection prevention and control had been reduced. Staff did not always follow the good practice principles for safe care in relation to transferring people in hoists and assisting people with texture modified diets. Some people did not think there were always enough staff. Records lacked evidence to show medicines given ‘as and when required’ were given in line with the least restrictive principles however, we observed medicines were administered and managed safely on the day of the inspection. People felt safe living at Amber Lodge Nursing Home, and they received support from other health and care services that they needed.

We were not assured people were prompted to drink enough fluids and records for people’s fluid and diet intake were not always accurate. Care plans and risk assessments were not always upto date and did not always contain all relevant information. Aspects of people’s care and treatment were not always monitored. However, people were asked for their consent and could choose from a variety of meal options. Their weight was monitored to ensure they maintained a healthy weight. The staff team worked well together and supported people to live healthier lives.

Information was known on people’s life histories, preferences and communication needs. People were treated with kindness, empathy and compassion and staff respected their privacy and responded to people’s immediate needs. Staff were positive about the support they received from the leadership team. However, not everyone felt happy with how people were supported to maintain their personal appearance. People told us their choices were sometimes affected by whether staff were available to help them.

People’s communication needs were known, and they received the services they needed from other health and social care organisations. People and staff were asked for their views on the quality and safety of the service and their feedback was listened to. Their home was accessible and adapted to their healthcare needs. Advance care planning was in place to help ensure people’s needs would be met in the future. People told us the availability of staff sometimes affected whether they received person-centred care.

The provider was actively implementing a range of improvements across staff training, care planning, the care environment and management systems. They were focussed on continuous learning and improvement. The leadership team were viewed as caring and capable and staff felt respected and confident to raise any concerns should they need to. They worked with other health and social care professionals and incorporated their feedback into on-going improvement plans. However, the provider did not yet have fully embedded clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability or good governance. They did not always have a comprehensive overview on information about risk, performance and outcomes.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/ or appeals have been concluded.

18 January 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Amber Lodge Nursing Home is a care home providing personal and nursing care for up to 40 older adults, including people living with dementia. At the time of the inspection there were 36 people living at the home.

The home accommodates people in one adapted building with facilities on two separate floors.

We found the following examples of good practice.

The provider followed current Government guidelines to protect visitors from catching and spreading infection. For example, visitors were provided with personal protective equipment (PPE) to wear whilst visiting the home. Visitors, including health care professionals were asked to complete a lateral flow test (LFT) and health care professionals were asked to evidence their COVID-19 vaccination status before entering the home. All staff who worked at the home were vaccinated against COVID-19.

The provider had installed additional hand washing facilities around the building to promote good hand hygiene and there were several PPE stations placed in prominent areas of the home.

Staff were observed wearing correct personal protective equipment (PPE).

People were admitted into the service safely. The provider ensured people had been tested for COVID-19 before admitting them into the home.

People and staff had adequate access to COVID-19 testing programme. Staff had good understanding of COVID-19 symptoms that present in older people. Provider ensured the staff and people who presented with COVID- 19 symptoms, tested immediately.

The provider had an infection prevention policy in place and contacted their local health protection team in a timely way in the event of COVID- 19 outbreak.

During the active COVID-19 outbreak staff supported people to maintain contact with their loved ones via phone calls and window visits.