• Hospital
  • NHS hospital

Archived: Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases NHS Foundation Trust

Upper Borough Walls, Bath, Somerset, BA1 1RL (01225) 465941

Provided and run by:
Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases NHS Foundation Trust

Important: This service is now managed by a different provider - see new profile

All Inspections

16, 17, 19 December 2013

During a routine inspection

We visited the ward area, the outpatients department and the day unit. We spoke with ten patients from the inpatient and outpatient departments; eight nurses and care staff; management and facilities staff. We looked at patient records.

We were accompanied on the 16 October 2013 by an expert by experience who spent time observing care and talking with patients.

All of the patients told us they were highly satisfied with the service they received. Some patients said they had fought hard to get referred, and saw the hospital as a 'life saver' for the way it had helped them manage their conditions. Patients unanimously showed concern that the hospital was to merge and potentially the specialist treatment received would be 'lost to them'.

Patients told us staff always asked their permission before providing care and treatment. They said they were given sufficient information to make informed choices.

We found the provider had procedures to ensure other healthcare professionals involved in patient's care were kept fully informed of the outcome of the treatment.

The provider had effective systems to promote cleanliness and reduce infection. We observed all areas of the hospital were visibly clean.

The provider had systems to ensure new staff were suitably qualified, skilled and experienced to undertake their roles. There were enough staff on duty to support people safely and effectively.

The provider had an effective quality monitoring system.

2 August 2012

During a themed inspection looking at Dignity and Nutrition

People told us what it was like to stay at this hospital and described how they were treated by staff and their involvement in making choices about their care. They also told us about the quality and choice of food and drink available. This was because this inspection was part of a themed inspection programme to assess whether people staying in hospitals are treated with dignity and respect and whether their nutritional needs are met.

The inspection team was led by a CQC inspector joined by an Expert by Experience (people who have experience of using services and who can provide that perspective) and a practising professional, who was a consultant specialising in the care of older people.

People were positive in their views of how they were supported by the staff team. Examples of comments people told us included, 'It's not like a hospital, it's a family place'. 'There is continuity of staff here'. 'They treat you as an individual'. 'It's as if the staff all like what they are doing'.

During an inspection looking at part of the service

The purpose of this review was to follow up the actions taken by the trust in response to our visit in October 2011. In October 2011 we found that not all staff had received training with regard to safeguarding vulnerable adults and children. In addition we asked the trust to review other training that staff who work for them had completed.

The trust has provided us with information relating the training that staff have now completed. This shows that the majority of staff have undertaken mandatory training. The majority of staff now receive regular supervision and appraisals. Over 80% of staff have now completed training in relation to safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.

We did not speak to people who use the service on this occasion.

26 October 2011

During a routine inspection

People told us that they were happy with the way that staff were caring for them. We spoke with nine patients during our visit.

People told us that staff treated them with respect and that they were involved in decisions about their care. We saw that people had a timetable of the treatments and therapies that they would be having. People told us that they appreciated this as it enabled them to plan their day. One person told us "I cannot fault the staff here and I have no complaints. My family are kept informed and are involved in planning for me to be discharged. I have a weekly timetable which is easy to read and I can see what I am doing. The staff have been good in discussing my needs and care. I know all that is happening'. People told us that they were provided with good information both about their condition and the treatment options available to them. We saw leaflets and information in the outpatients department, communal and ward areas. People told us that they understood the information that was given to them and that staff take time to ensure that they understood it. One person told us "All the information sent to me was very useful. I feel that I have been included in discussions when medical staff and others have seen me. I have been told when my therapy appointments are and there is a list on the corridor wall to check this'.

There are no mixed sex wards at the RNHRD with the exception of the High Dependency Unit where men and women are afforded some privacy within single sex bays.

Patients said that the consultants and the specialist teams at the hospital were 'very good' and 'the best I've ever had'. We were told that the staff listen to patients and take time to understand them. A relative told us "We have been supported by the staff and feel care is person centred and inclusive. Staff have been teaching us how to provide support which has been helpful when we have our son staying at home." Another relative said "Without this hospital my relative would not have been able to maintain their independence and would have a very low quality of life."

We observed staff members taking with people in a calm, professional and respectful manner.

We reviewed the care records for six people who were inpatients during our visit.

Care plans were seen to be person centred and contained clear guidance for staff on the patients needs and any actions to take in the event of a change in their condition. They recorded both long term and short term goals in the recovery period.

At least two care plans did not have clear review dates and did not have a record that they had been regularly reviewed for any changes. We raised this with the nursing staff who agreed that it was not clear when the care plan was due for review.

People who use the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases may not be safeguarded against abuse. This is due to a lack of staff training and understanding in this area.

Staff have the skills and competencies to meet the needs of people who use the hospital but not all staff have reviewed or updated their mandatory training.

Staff feel well supported but not all staff receive regular supervision or appraisals.

The Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases has a number of different ways of assessing and monitoring the service that it delivers. This includes regular staff meetings, questionnaires and surveys of patients and staff, and audits of practice and procedures.