Lalis Direct Care Ltd

On this page

• Overview
• Person-centred Care
• Care provision, Integration and continuity
• Providing Information
• Listening to and involving people
• Equity in access
• Equity in experiences and outcomes
• Planning for the future

Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

We assessed a limited number of quality statements in the responsive key question and found areas of good practice. The scores for this area have been combined with scores based on the rating from the last inspection, which was good.

This service scored 71 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

We did not look at Person-centred Care during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.

We did not look at Care provision, Integration and continuity during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.

We did not look at Providing Information during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.

We did not look at Listening to and involving people during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.

We did not look at Equity in access during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.

Staff were supported to respect people’s human rights. People’s care plans included information on any religious or cultural preferences and what was important to them. Staff completed training on equality, diversity and human rights. The provider had policies and procedures in relation to equality, diversity and human rights. People’s care plans identified specific preferences in relation to their care such as the gender of staff members who would be providing the person’s care.

We did not look at Planning for the future during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Responsive.