• Doctor
  • GP practice

Edenfield Road Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Cutgate Precinct, Rochdale, Lancashire, OL11 5AQ (01706) 344125

Provided and run by:
Edenfield Road Surgery

Assessment report published 26 May 2026

On this page

Well-led

Good

30 April 2026

We looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture

At our last assessment, we rated this key question as GOOD. At this assessment, the rating has remained the same.

This service scored 71 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities.
All staff had contributed to the development of the practice vision and strategy, which was kept under review. The practice was aware of the projected increase in the local population and was working with partner agencies to address future challenges.
 

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The service had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty.
Staff told us leaders in the practice was approachable and responded to any concerns raised. Staff also told us leaders modelled the values of the practice. We saw the leadership team worked with other practices in the primary care network and were engaged in the development of primary care services within the local area.
 

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

The service fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard.
The practice had established Freedom to Speak up arrangements with other practices in the primary care network. Staff were aware of how to raise concerns, and we saw examples where staff had used the arrangements in place to positive effect.
 

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The service valued diversity in their workforce. They work towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who work for them.
Policies and procedures to promote diversity and equality were in place. We saw senior leaders had addressed concerns related to discrimination. Adjustments had been made to ensure all staff were valued, for example we saw adjustments to support disabled staff were in place.
 

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 2

The service overall had clear responsibilities, roles, and systems of accountability. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. They act on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and share this securely with others when appropriate.
However, the governance systems did not ensure staff received effective supervision, and there was no formal appraisal process in place.
This longstanding absence of any formal appraisal process has resulted in a continued lack of structured feedback for staff, development planning, and performance oversight. Structured plans and risk assessments were in place for appraisals to commence.
Staff could access all required policies and procedures. Training was available and up to date for all staff.
 

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

The service understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services work seamlessly for people. They share information and learning with partners and collaborate for improvement. The provider worked with other practices within their primary care network.

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The service focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. They actively contribute to safe, effective practice and research.
The practice had a quality improvement plan in place to help drive improvements in services, this focussed on the appointment system.