• Doctor
  • GP practice

Jubilee Gardens Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Jubilee Gardens, Southall, Middlesex, UB1 2TJ (020) 3313 7806

Provided and run by:
Jubilee Gardens Medical Centre

Assessment report published 30 April 2025

On this page

Well-led

Good

8 April 2025

We looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture

At our last assessment, we rated this key question as Good. At this assessment, the rating remains the same.

This service scored 71 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities.

All staff contributed to the development of the practice vision and strategy, which was kept under review. The practice was aware of the projected increase in the local population and worked with partner agencies to address future challenges.

 

 

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The service had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty.

Staff told us leaders in the practice were approachable and responded to any concerns raised. Staff also told us leaders modelled the values of the practice. We saw the leadership team worked with other practices in the primary care network and were engaged in the development of primary care services within the local area.

 

 

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

The service fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voices would be heard.

The practice established Freedom to Speak up arrangements with other practices in the primary care network. Staff were aware of how to raise concerns, and we saw examples where staff used the arrangements in place to positive effect.

 

 

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The service valued diversity in their workforce. They worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who worked for them.

Policies and procedures to promote diversity and equality were in place. We saw senior leaders addressed concerns related to discrimination. Adjustments were made to ensure all staff were valued, for example we saw adjustments to support disabled staff were in place.

 

 

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 2

The service had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. They acted on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and shared this securely with others when appropriate.

Leaders and managers supported staff, and all staff we spoke with were clear on their individual roles and responsibilities. Managers met with staff regularly to complete appraisals and performance reviews. The provider established governance processes that were appropriate for their service. Staff could access all required policies and procedures. Managers held regular practice meetings with staff, during which they discussed clinical concerns and emerging risks. Managers clearly recorded any actions arising from these meetings and ensured they shared these with staff. Staff took patient confidentiality and information security seriously.

However, we found some areas for improvement to support good governance. For example, supervision of the Physician Associate and GP Assistant was not formalised, policies and procedures were not always reviewed or tailored to the practice and there was no formal oversight of the sessional GPs such as by carrying out consultation audits.

 

 

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

The service focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. They actively contributed to safe, effective practice and research.

The practice had a quality improvement plan in place to help drive improvements in services. All staff were encouraged to put forward and test out new ways of working.

 

 

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The service focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. They actively contributed to safe, effective practice and research.

The practice had a quality improvement plan in place to help drive improvements in services. All staff were encouraged to put forward and test out new ways of working.