• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Triangle Group Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2 Morley Road, Lewisham, London, SE13 6DQ (020) 8318 5231

Provided and run by:
Triangle Group Practice

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

Assessment report published 31 July 2025

On this page

Well-led

Good

7 July 2025

We looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture

At our last assessment, we rated this key question as Requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to Good.

This service scored 71 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities.

 

All staff had contributed to the development of the practice vision and strategy, which was kept under review. The practice proactively encouraged staff members to voice any suggestions which could improve the service delivery. The service shared its vision and strategy with the PPG who helped to communicate this with the wider patient population.

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The service had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty.

 

Staff told us leaders in the practice were approachable and responded to any concerns raised. We saw the leadership team worked with other practices in the primary care network and were engaged in the development of primary care services within the local area. For example, the practice manager stated they were in regular contact with other practice managers within the locality, and learning was collectively shared on a regular basis.

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

The service fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard. All staff members reported they felt able to voice concerns without fear of retribution.

 

The practice had established Freedom to Speak up arrangements with other practices in the primary care network. Staff were aware of how to raise concerns, and we saw examples where staff had used the arrangements in place to positive effect. All staff we spoke with were able to name the Freedom To Speak Up Guardian.

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The service valued diversity in their workforce. They work towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who work for them.

 

Policies and procedures to promote diversity and equality were in place. Adjustments had been made to ensure all staff were valued. We saw adjustments to support home-working of staff members (where possible) were in place. All staff members completed equality and diversity training as part of the practice induction programme.

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 2

The service had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support in the majority of instances. However, some governance systems within the practice were not always fully effective. For example, we found some gaps in the monitoring of patients prescribed certain medicines, and not all staff personnel files were complete with all the relevant information applicable to their roles. The practice act on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and share this securely with others when appropriate.

 

Leaders and managers supported staff, and all staff we spoke with were clear on their individual roles and responsibilities. Managers met with staff regularly to complete appraisals and performance reviews. The provider had established governance processes that were appropriate for their service. Staff could access all required policies and procedures. Managers held regular practice meetings with staff, during which they discussed clinical concerns and emerging risks. Managers clearly recorded any actions arising from these meetings and ensured they shared these with staff. Staff took patient confidentiality and information security seriously.

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

The service understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services work seamlessly for people. They share information and learning with partners and collaborate for improvement.

 

The service had dedicated team that focused on hospital referrals to ensure that patients received an appointment and to follow up on patients who did not attend.

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The service focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. They actively contribute to safe, effective practice and research.

 

The practice had recently introduced an instant messaging channel which meant they could broadcast messages to subscribed patients and reach a large audience at one time. For example, we saw evidence of this being used to communicate messages regarding the cyber attack on another health provider and the Pharmacy First scheme.