• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Steven Shackman Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Mountwood Surgery, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RG (01923) 828488

Provided and run by:
The Steven Shackman Practice

Assessment report published 3 August 2026

On this page

Caring

Good

3 August 2026

We looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

At our last assessment in 2016, we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating remains the same.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Kindness, compassion and dignity

Score: 3

The service always treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and respected their privacy and dignity. Staff treated colleagues from other organisations with kindness and respect.

Arrangements were in place to promote patients’ privacy. National GP Patient Survey data 2025 reflected people felt listened to and were treated with kindness. For example:

The percentage of respondents to the GP patient survey who responded positively to the overall experience of their GP practice was 75.8% compared to a national average of 75.4%.

The percentage of respondents to the GP Patient Survey who stated that during their last appointment, the healthcare professional was very good or fairly good at listening to them was 92.3% compared to a national average of 86.9%.

The percentage of respondents to the GP patient survey who responded positively to the overall experience of their GP practice was 84.3% compared to a national average of 75.4%.

The percentage of respondents to the GP Patient Survey who stated that during their last appointment, the healthcare professional was very good or fairly good at treating them with care and concern was 85.6% compared to a national average of 85.6%.

The percentage of respondents to the GP patient survey who stated that during their last appointment they had confidence and trust in the healthcare professional they saw or spoke to was 92.5% compared to a national average of 92.5%.

Staff we spoke with understood Gillick competency and there was a process to ensure young adults had control over their own privacy and the amount of parental involvement in managing their care and support.

Treating people as individuals

Score: 3

The service treated people as individuals and made sure people’s care, support and treatment met people’s needs and preferences. They took account of people’s strengths, abilities, aspirations, culture and unique backgrounds and protected characteristics.

Patients’ personal, cultural, social, religious and equality characteristics needs were understood and met. Patient communication needs were met to enable them to be fully involved in their care.

The results from the National GP Survey 2025 showed that the percentage of respondents to the GP patient survey who stated that during their last appointment they were involved as much as they wanted to be in decisions about their care and treatment was 90.7% compared to a national average of 91.2%.

Independence, choice and control

Score: 3

The service promoted people’s independence, so people knew their rights and had choice and control over their own care, treatment and wellbeing. Staff helped patients and their carers to access advocacy and community-based services.

Responding to people’s immediate needs

Score: 3

The service listened to and understood people’s needs, views and wishes. Staff responded to people’s needs in the moment and acted to minimise any discomfort, concern or distress.

There was a system for appointment triage that ensured people with immediate needs had access to services. Staff we spoke with knew the process for referral to emergency support, including mental health crisis teams.

Workforce wellbeing and enablement

Score: 3

The service cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to always deliver person-centred care.

Staff told us they were valued by leaders. Leaders had taken steps to recognise and meet the wellbeing needs of staff, which included the necessary resources and facilities for safe working, such as regular breaks and rest areas. Staff reported being supported if they were struggling at work. We saw team building days were established within the practice. The service had a health and wellbeing room and prayer room.