- GP practice
Clifton Court Medical Practice
Assessment report published 6 May 2026
Contents
On this page
- Overview
- Kindness, compassion and dignity
- Treating people as individuals
- Independence, choice and control
- Responding to people’s immediate needs
- Workforce wellbeing and enablement
Caring
We looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment, we rated this key question as Good. At this assessment, the rating remains the same.
This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.
Kindness, compassion and dignity
The provider treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and respected their privacy and dignity. Arrangements were in place to promote patients’ privacy, including a private room if a patient did not wish to speak at reception. Where language barriers existed, interpretation services were made available, and longer appointments were offered when needed. Clinicians ensured care and treatment was tailored to personal and cultural preferences.
National GP Patient Survey data reflected that people felt listened to and were treated with kindness. Ninety percent of patients who responded said the healthcare professional they saw or spoke to was good at treating them with care and concern during their last general practice appointment, slightly above the local average of 88%and the National average of 86%. Eighty-two per centof patients who responded said the healthcare professional they saw or spoke to was good at considering their mental wellbeing during their last general practice appointment, above the local average of 77%and the National average of 74%.
Extra information on end of life care and bereavement support was given to families. A condolence card was sent to bereaved families
Treating people as individuals
The provider treated people as individuals and made sure people’s care, support and treatment met people’s needs and preferences. They took account of people’s strengths, abilities, aspirations, culture and unique backgrounds and protected characteristics.Patient communication needs were met to enable them to be fully involved in their care. Where people required reasonable adjustments, this was flagged on their record and staff showed a high awareness.
The National GP Patient Survey showed the number of patients who responded who thought the healthcare professional they saw or spoke to was good at listening to them during their last general practice appointment was 91%, slightly above the local average of 89% and the national average of 87%. Ninety four per cent of patients who responded had confidence and trust in the healthcare professional they saw or spoke to during their last general practice appointment, in line with local and national averages of 93%.
Independence, choice and control
The provider promoted people’s independence, so people knew their rights and had choice and control over their own care, treatment and wellbeing.
Staff helped patients and their carers to access advocacy and community-based services.
Responding to people’s immediate needs
The provider had processes in place to listen to and understand people’s needs, views and wishes. There was a system for appointment triage that ensured people with immediate needs had access to services. Staff we spoke with knew the process for referral to emergency support, including mental health crisis teams.
Staff were able to give examples where they had appropriately triaged and escalated concerns to the on call GP.
In the National GP Patient Survey, 95%of respondentsfelt their needs were met during their last general practice appointment, above the local average of 91% and the national average of 90%.
Workforce wellbeing and enablement
The provider gave us examples of how they cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff, and supported and enabled staff to always deliver person-centred care, such as sharing and promoting positive feedback received from patients.
The provider had identified several action plan priorities in response to their 2025 staff survey. These included formalising a staff wellbeing strategy, introducing a mentoring pathway, and more regular ‘pulse’ surveys with action plan tracking. Some changes already implemented included adjustments to rotas and weekly meetings with an open agenda displayed at reception for staff contributions. Some of the positive results included 92% of respondents saying they felt a sense of belonging, and involvement in decision making. 100% of respondents said they felt valued, and 100% said they felt physically and emotionally safe. 100% said their workload was manageable. The survey said improvements could be made around clearer procedures for lone working, and having adequate resources/facilities, such as rest areas and breaks. There was a staff well-being lead and group activities and awards to promote staff wellbeing.
Staff consistently described open door policies of leaders, good communication between teams, and a supportive environment. Staff reported and appreciated high levels of personal and professional support from leaders.