• Doctor
  • GP practice

Amherst Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

21 St. Botolphs Road, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN13 2RP (01732) 459255

Provided and run by:
Amherst Medical Practice

Assessment report published 14 July 2025

On this page

Well-led

Good

13 June 2025

We looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

At our last assessment in April 2017, we rated this key question as Good. At this assessment, the rating remains the same.

The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

Leaders detailed a clear vision and values for the service. This was shared with staff. Staff were aware of and understood the vision, values and strategy and their role in achieving them.We found that there was a clear vision and set of values, which the service acted on. The service had a realistic strategy and supporting business plans to achieve priorities. The strategy was in line with health and social priorities across the region. The provider planned the service to meet the needs of the local population. The provider monitored progress against delivery of the strategy.

The practice was aware of the projected increase in the local population and was working with partner agencies to address future challenges.

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The service had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty.

Staff told us that managers were generally visible and approachable and that they worked closely with staff and others to make sure they prioritised compassionate and inclusive management leadership.

There were clear lines of responsibility to support capable leadership. The practice had put in place job descriptions for all staff and had ensured staff were aware of their roles and responsibilities.

We saw the leadership team worked with other practices in the primary care network and were engaged in the development of primary care services within the local area.

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

The service fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard.

The practice had established Freedom to Speak up arrangements with other practices in the primary care network. Staff were aware of how to raise concerns.

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The service valued diversity in their workforce. They worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who work for them.

Policies and procedures to promote diversity and equality were in place. We saw senior leaders had addressed concerns related to discrimination. Adjustments had been made to ensure all staff were valued. For example, we saw adjustments to support staff working flexibly.

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 3

The service had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver high-quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. They always acted on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and shared this securely with others when appropriate.

Leaders and managers supported staff, and all staff we spoke with were clear on their individual roles and responsibilities. Managers met with staff regularly to complete appraisals and performance reviews.

The provider had established governance processes that were appropriate for their service. Staff could access all required policies and procedures. GP partners and managers held regular practice meetings with staff, during which they discussed clinical concerns and emerging risks. Managers clearly recorded any actions arising from these meetings and ensured they shared these with staff. Staff took patient confidentiality and information security seriously.

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

The service understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services worked seamlessly for people. They shared information and learning with partners and collaborated for improvement.

The provider worked with other practices within their primary care network to offer extended access, flu and Covid vaccination programmes and minor procedures. Staff had made adjustments to improve coordination of their service with community healthcare services.

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The service focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people.

The practice had a quality improvement plan to help drive improvements in services This focussed on the appointment system, medicine prescribing and people’s wellbeing.