- Care home
Oak Cottage
We have served three warning notices on Oak Cottage Care Limited on 17 December 2025. This was for continuing to fail to meet the regulations after our previous inspection. The continued failings related to safe care and treatment, ensuring staff had the required knowledge for their role and a continued lack of good governance at Oak Cottage.
Assessment report published 6 February 2026
Contents
Ratings
Our view of the service
Date of Assessment: 13 November 2025 to 09 December 2025. The service is a residential care home providing support to up to 25 people, including those living with dementia and mental health support needs. At the time of this assessment twenty people were receiving personal care.
We found 6 breaches of regulations relating to person-centred care, staffing, consent, safeguarding, premises and good governance. 3 of these breaches relating to person centred care, staffing and good governance were continued from our previous assessment on 24 November 2024.
We identified widespread concerns at this assessment, which had not been identified and mitigated by the provider through their own governance systems.
People were not active partners in their care. Although staff knew people well, their care records did not reflect this knowledge. Risks to people were not identified, reviewed when needed or have sufficient assessment plans in place to ensure those risks were mitigated.
Staff and management were not provided with the necessary training to support them in their specific roles. Care staff had limited training to support people’s specialist needs, such as dementia. Managers had little training to support effective supervision, appraisal of staff and to effectively manage the service. No staff member had fully completed their training modules over the past 12 months.
Legal requirements relating to capacity and consent were not consistently in place, and systems for safeguarding were ineffective, placing people at risk of harm.
The provider’s oversight and governance of the service had been ineffective in identifying and addressing failings in safety, quality, and standards, as detailed in the Safe, Effective, and Well-Led sections of this report. This contributed to both continued breaches of regulations alongside newly imposed breaches of legal regulation. The provider and / or registered manager did not have clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability or good governance. The service lacked a clear vision of the direction and standards they wished to see at the home and had not implemented effective and robust quality assurance systems that led to the delivery of demonstrable improvements.
This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide. In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward. We have also asked the provider for an action plan in response to some of the concerns found at this assessment.
People's experience of this service
We observed staff interactions with people and observed care and support in communal areas. We observed throughout our assessment that people were cared for through kind and caring interactions. We spoke with 3 people during our visit, received feedback from 4 relatives, 3 staff, the registered manager and 3 managers and 2 professionals. People said they felt safe living in Oak Cottage and said they found staff approachable, kind and sensitive to their needs. Comments included, “I have had no concerns about safety regarding either staff or other residents. I have in fact found all the care-staff to be extremely caring, helpful and cheerful.”
Staff treated people with kindness and knew people well although people were not always involved in planning their own care, some people’s needs had not been assessed, however they described staff as caring and responsive. People told us they had access to external health professionals when needed.
People did raise their concerns regarding staffing levels in the home. They said that at times they would wait for staff to assist them. People said staff would not always spend meaningful time with them when there wasn’t a planned trip or activity or when activity staff were not available.