• Dentist
  • Dentist

300 Great Western Street

300 Great Western Street, Rusholme, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M14 4LP (0161) 226 2548

Provided and run by:
Dr. Sean Hasnain

All Inspections

19 July 2019

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of 300 Great Western Street on 19 July 2019. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who had remote access to a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of 300 Great Western Street on 15 February 2019 which continued on 20 February 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe or well led care and was in breach of regulations 12, 13, 17, 19 and 20 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for 300 Great Western Street on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 15 February 2019.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 15 February 2019.

Background

300 Great Western Street (known locally as Rusholme Dental Practice) is in Rusholme, Manchester and provides NHS and private treatment to adults and children.

There is level access to the ground floor reception and surgeries for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. On street parking is available near the practice.

The dental team includes three dentists including a foundation dentist, 11 dental nurses (six of whom are trainees), a dental hygienist, two dental hygiene therapists (one of which is a foundation therapist), two receptionists and a practice manager. The practice has four treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the registered individual, the practice manager, two dental nurses and a receptionist. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday to Friday 9am to 1pm and 2pm to 5pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean, tidy and well maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had systems to help them identify and manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The provider had effective leadership and culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The provider had suitable information governance arrangements.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the practice’s protocols to ensure the results of audits of infection prevention and control have documented learning points and the resulting improvements can be demonstrated.
  • Review the practice's recruitment procedures to ensure that appropriate checks are completed prior to new staff commencing employment at the practice. In particular, seeking references of previous satisfactory employment.

15 February 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this unannounced inspection on 15 February 2019 and a further announced inspection on the 20 February 2019 (which was a continuation of the inspection process) under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in response to information of concern, and as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser and a second CQC inspector.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

300 Great Western Street (known locally as Rusholme Dental Practice) is in Rusholme, Manchester and provides NHS and private treatment to adults and children.

There is level access to the ground floor reception and surgeries for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. On street parking is available near the practice.

The dental team includes three dentists including a foundation dentist, 13 dental nurses (eight of which are trainees), a dental hygienist, two dental hygiene therapists (one of which is a foundation therapist), two receptionists and a practice manager. The practice has four treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection, we collected one CQC comment card filled in by a patient.

During the inspection we spoke with the dentists including the foundation dentist, dental nurses, the dental hygiene therapist, the foundation hygiene therapist, a receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday to Friday 9am to 1pm and 2pm to 5pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The premises were clean and well maintained, with the exception of some areas which were dusty. Environmental cleaning could be improved.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance with the exception of the processes for manually cleaning instruments.
  • Staff did not all know how to deal with emergencies. Immediate action was needed to make appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment available.
  • The practice did not have effective systems to help them identify and manage risk to patients and staff.
  • Improvements were needed to the safeguarding processes. The practice did not ensure that staff were up to date with training. They knew their responsibilities to report any safeguarding concerns.
  • The provider did not have thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supporting patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The systems to document and deal with complaints required improvement.
  • The provider did not have suitable information governance arrangements.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Ensure patients are protected from abuse and improper treatment.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure only fit and proper persons are employed.
  • Act in accordance with the Duty of Candour.

Full details of the regulations the provider is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the availability of an interpreter service for patients who do not speak English as their first language.
  • Review staff awareness of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and ensure all staff are aware of their responsibilities under the Act as it relates to their role.
  • Review the practice’s infection control procedures and protocols taking into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health in the Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, and having regard to The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance’ (In particular, the arrangements for transporting instruments, the illuminated magnification device and standards of environmental cleaning).

12 June 2013

During a routine inspection

During our inspection visit we spoke with two patients who had or were about to receive treatment. Patents told us they were happy with the service they received. Patients advised us the staff had always been helpful, polite, respectful and sensitive towards them and they said they had confidence in the staff's skills and expertise.

We received the following comments from the patients, 'It's really good, I'm happy to be with the practice.' 'They [staff] really help and gives lots of advice.' ' Staff take their time and always explain things properly.'

Patients told us their treatment options were explained fully to them, so they were able to make informed decisions about what treatments were best for them and which they would prefer. Patients confirmed they received thorough examinations and were provided with dental advice.

We found the service to be adhering to standards of infection control although we did point out some minor issues that may require attention.

We found staff were trained and supported to carry out their work at the surgery.

We saw there were systems in place to both monitor and further develop the practice to help ensure the best outcome for people using the practice.