• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

Archived: Care and Support Partnership HQ

North Swindon District Centre, Thamesdown Drive, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN25 4AN (01793) 708700

Provided and run by:
Care And Support Partnership Community Interest Company

Important: This service was previously managed by a different provider - see old profile

All Inspections

Other CQC inspections of services

Community & mental health inspection reports for Care and Support Partnership HQ can be found at Care And Support Partnership Community Interest Company. Each report covers findings for one service across multiple locations

10, 11, 12, 14 February 2014

During a routine inspection

The Care and Support Partnership is a community enterprise scheme that provides a number of services to the Swindon area. At this inspection visit we looked at the Community Nursing service, which is run out of the organisation's main office.

People who received a service from the community nursing team we spoke with told us they were happy with the quality of care and treatment provided. We were told the staff were friendly, respectful and professional.

The community nursing team provided a variety of specialist services which promoted independence and helped people remain in the community to receive the treatment they needed.

The provider had effective systems in place to recruit staff and provided people with the appropriate training. Nursing staff were supported to maintain their qualifications and develop their professional skills.

The provider ensured that all staff had completed training in adult protection and there were effective systems in place for the reporting of concerns.

People who used the service were provided with information about the provider's complaints process.

The provider had systems in place to monitor and audit risk.

18 March 2013

During a routine inspection

During our visit we looked at the feedback received by the service. One person had written, 'I do not think that you could have done any better. This is a service that is greatly needed within the community to enable people like myself to live as independently as possible within their own homes'. One relative had written, 'You were all really kind and supportive of my mother'.

People's needs were assessed and described in their care records and there was evidence that people had been involving in the planning of the care and support they needed. We saw that there was good communication between the multi-agency staff that supported people to remain at home and this was reflected in people's support plans.

The provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening, but we did note that not all staff had received up to date training regarding this.

We saw that staff were suitably trained and experienced to meet the needs of people using the service. The exception to this was the lack of mandatory training undertaken by the reablement support workers. We saw some staff groups were well supported but found evidence that others were not supervised at the recognised, appropriate frequency.

The provider had methods to assess and monitor the quality of the service but the manager we spoke with during our visit could not tell us about all of the methods.

20 October 2011

During a routine inspection

Re-ablement -

We spoke with staff and people who used a service from the re-ablement team. A member of staff said that they enjoyed their work 'helping people to help themselves'. They said it was good 'to see the positive effects of the service'. We took the opportunity to speak with an occupational therapist and the manager of the physiotherapy team. They each said that they believed the service worked really well.

We spoke with four people who received a service. They all said they appreciated the support they had and were complimentary about the staff. They said that staff arrived at appropriate times for the tasks they were to be supported in and none of them had experienced a missed call.

Two females said that they had male staff to support them and they were not happy about this. One of them told us they had declined their full support on one occasion. Another said they were not happy about undressing in front of a male member of staff.

Two of the people we spoke with said they did not know how to complain however, the others did know. Other than the comments above people said they had no complaints.

Shared lives -

The shared lives scheme offered two types of family support. There were some people that lived as part of a family with their carers. Others shared accommodation and their support was from family carers who lived elsewhere. We met with people receiving each type of support.

Four people we met lived in one of two family homes we visited. They were clearly comfortable in their surroundings, some having lived in the placement for many years. One person told us that moving into the placement had given them more independence.

We met with others who shared houses. They were glad of the independence and freedom this provided but were also happy with the supportive carers who one person described as 'good people'. People told us about the varying types of support they had and found to be valuable.