• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Look Ahead Domiciliary Care (Hertfordshire)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Oak View, 64-66 Hydean Way, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG2 9XL (01438) 740096

Provided and run by:
Look Ahead Care and Support Limited

Assessment report published 27 April 2026

Ratings

  • Overall

    Good

  • Safe

    Good

  • Effective

    Good

  • Caring

    Good

  • Responsive

    Requires improvement

  • Well-led

    Good

Our view of the service

We undertook an inspection of Look Ahead Domiciliary (Hertfordshire) on 26 February to 26 March 2026. At our last inspection, the service was rated as Requires Improvement (Published 16 June 2025). This inspection was announced.This inspection followed the previous inspection where we found breaches of regulations.

Look Ahead Domiciliary Care (Hertfordshire) is a supported living service providing personal care to people living in their own homes. The service provides support to people with a learning disability and autistic people. At the time of our inspection, there were 19 people using the service, 15 people received the regulated activity.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right support, right care, right culture is the statutory guidance which supports Care Quality Commission (CQC) to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people. We considered this guidance as there were people using the service who have a learning disability and or who are autistic. The service met this guidance.

We spoke with 13 staff members. This included support workers, managers and senior leaders. We got feedback from professionals that supported people living at the service.

At the last inspection, we found a breach in keeping people safe from harm and abuse and governance. We issued 2 warning notices which outlined actions to take to improve people’s care. This assessment was triggered to review the warning notices. We found at this assessment that both warning notices were met, and the provider was no longer in breach of regulation.

The service demonstrated a positive and proactive culture of safety, with openness, learning, and accountability clearly embedded in practice. Staff understood how to recognise, report and respond to incidents and safeguarding concerns, and timely action was taken to help keep people safe. Risk assessments were person centred and regularly reviewed to promote independence while managing risk, including physical and emotional wellbeing. Since the last inspection, leaders had reflected on restrictive practices and ensured these were reviewed, justified, and aligned with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 ‑and least restrictive principles.

People received care in safe, well managed‑ environments, supported by sufficient numbers of skilled and competent staff. Recruitment processes were robust, and staff received regular training, supervision and support tailored to the needs of people using the service. Medicines were largely managed safely, and any identified gaps in staff knowledge were addressed promptly through management action. Infection prevention and control required further improvement to ensure risks were assessed and managed consistently across all environments; however, staff demonstrated awareness of risks and took appropriate action when concerns arose.

The service was well led, with compassionate, approachable leaders who promoted openness, inclusion and a shared sense of purpose. Staff felt supported, valued, and confident to raise concerns, and feedback was used to inform improvement. Governance systems provided oversight through audits, checks and learning from incidents, although further work was needed to fully embed registration and governance arrangements across all services. The provider worked effectively with partners and the wider community and demonstrated‑ a strong commitment to continuous learning, collaboration and improving outcomes and quality of life for people supported.

People's experience of this service

We gained feedback from 5 people about their experience of the care provided. Where people who used the service were unable to talk with us, we used different ways of communicating including using communication tools, pictures, objects and their body language. We are improving how we hear people's experience and views on services, when they have limited verbal communication.

People using the service felt safe, respected, and supported by kind, well-trained staff who promoted their independence and dignity. People expressed satisfaction, highlighting the service’s responsiveness to changing needs and good communication. They felt listened to and reassured by the care they received.