• Care Home
  • Care home

Allambie Court

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

55 Hinckley Road, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV11 6LG 07588 486139

Provided and run by:
ADL Plc

Assessment report published 27 March 2026

On this page

Effective

Good

10 February 2026

Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Assessing needs

Score: 3

The provider made sure people’s care and treatment was effective by assessing and reviewing their health, care, wellbeing and communication needs with them prior to them moving into the home to ensure these could be met safely. People and their relatives where appropriate had been involved in planning their care and reviews.

People’s care records were person centred. An assessment of their needs was included for example, communication, health and mobility. People also had regular check-ups with health and social care professionals.

Staff demonstrated a good knowledge of people’s needs and told us they were kept up to date about any changes. One staff member told us, “Our managers do all the assessing. They let us know what we need to do and it’s in the care plans."

Delivering evidence-based care and treatment

Score: 3

The provider planned and delivered people’s care and treatment with them, including what was important and mattered to them. They did this in line with legislation and current evidence-based good practice and standards.

The provider used recognised tools to assess and identify risks to providing people’s care and support, including to assess the risk of skin damage, malnutrition and falls.

The service worked closely with health and social care professionals to ensure they delivered care safely. Care records incorporated professional guidance for staff to follow to ensure people’s care was delivered as directed and in line with evidence-based practice.

How staff, teams and services work together

Score: 3

The provider worked well across teams and services to support people. They made sure people only needed to tell their story once by sharing their assessment of needs when people moved between different services.

Relatives told us they were kept informed about any changes to their loved one needs. One relative said, “They involve me in decisions about [Person] and keep me informed”.

Care records showed when healthcare professionals had been contacted to discuss a person’s care and the outcome of these discussions. A staff member told us, “We get all the updates at handover every morning. If anything changes, we get told.” A healthcare professional who worked closely with the home said, “We work together to provide continuity of care. Staff know the residents very well."

Supporting people to live healthier lives

Score: 3

The provider supported people to manage their health and wellbeing to maximise their independence, choice and control. Staff supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support.

People confirmed they were supported to access healthcare services. One person told us, “Recently I had a virus, I saw the doctor and nurse. I’m feeling better now”. Another person said, “If I’m ill, they get the doctor. They always have medical staff here."

People’s care records included information of their health conditions. They included information about symptoms staff needed to respond to promptly including contact details for the appropriate healthcare professional. Staff confirmed they had the information they needed to care for people effectively. One staff member told us, “It’s our job to tell the manager or nurse about any changes or if a resident is under the weather, then they will call the doctor.”

Care records showed referrals had been made to healthcare professionals when needed to promote people’s safety and wellbeing.

Monitoring and improving outcomes

Score: 3

The provider routinely monitored people’s care and treatment to continuously improve it. They ensured that outcomes were positive and consistent, and that they met both clinical expectations and the expectations of people themselves.

Processes were in place to monitor the care and support people received. Where people had risks identified with their health, care records detailed outcomes and any monitoring required to ensure their needs were safely met. For example, in relation to skin integrity or when a modified diet was required.

Where needed staff completed records to evidence the monitoring of for example, dietary intakes and behavioural changes. This enabled staff to monitor people and identify if their needs were being met or when a change was needed to improve an outcome.

The provider told people about their rights around consent and respected these when delivering person-centred care and treatment.

People told us their choices were respected. Comments included, “I am involved in my care decisions,” and “I make my own choices and decisions.”

The management team and staff understood the importance of consent and assumed capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). Care records contained capacity assessments and where needed, for people assessed as not having capacity, decisions relating to aspects of their care were made in people’s best interests.

Staff confirmed they had received training about the requirements of the MCA and demonstrated an understanding of its principles. One staff member told us, “Never assume, always ask even if the resident can’t speak to you because we know our residents we can tell from the way they respond (body language)."