Archived: Solihull North Home Care Service

Crabtree Drive, Chelmsley Wood, Birmingham, West Midlands, B37 5BU

Provided and run by:
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile
Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

30 January 2013

During a routine inspection

When we visited the registered offices of Solihull North Home Care Service we saw that it was a reablement service. It offered support to people within their own homes following illness or hospitalisation. It supported people to regain skills and confidence in daily tasks so they could retain their independence. Reablement was a short term service provided for up to six weeks although this could be extended if further progress could be made. The level of support provided was reviewed at weekly meetings and reduced as people regained their skills and independence.

At the time of our visit the service was providing support for approximately 22 people. Staff who provided support were known as reablement assistants. We saw that staff received regular training to assist them to meet people's specific needs. People were positive about the staff supporting them. They told us, "The carers are fantastic." "There is a level of professionalism I can't fault." "I couldn't wish for better carers."

The service worked closely with occupational therapy to make adaptations so people could mobilise and use everyday equipment within their own home.

Staff were aware of their responsibilities for reporting any concerns regarding potential abuse.

We saw that the service had a complaints policy, a copy of which was provided to people when they started to use the service. People told us they had no complaints about the service.

19 January 2012

During a routine inspection

We visited the registered office of the service on 19 and 23 January 2012. The registered manager described the service as a reablement service. It offered adults care and support for up to six weeks in their own home to regain some independence after illness or injury.

We followed the care of two people. Each person was at a different stage in their six week programme of service.

We looked at a copy of the care records file for each person. We saw that each person had complete and up to date records individual to them. This included a care assessment and reablement support plan and relevant risk assessments. We noted that for one person a risk identified by the referring social worker was unclear and had not been accounted for in the person's support plan. The registered manager and workers that we spoke to assured us that this identified risk was not an issue for the person. We have asked the provider organisation to improve how it responds to lack of clarity in referrals in the future.

We spoke to the main care workers for the people whose care we followed. Each worker knew the person's assessed needs and reablement plan. They were also able to describe the risks that the person's condition presented and the agreed plan for managing those risks. Workers were involved in the process of weekly assessment of each person's reablement programme. They talked about people with respect. They were clearly interested in people's ability to regain skills that helped them to stay in their own home safely. They described the creative approach that they had taken to supporting one person whose care we followed to manage their own nutrition again.

The service was staffed and managed flexibly. This allowed for changes to people's support plans and level of support as they regained their independence.

We found that each worker had the up to date training necessary to meet the needs of the person who they regularly visited.

We found that the provider organisation had clear policy and procedures for safeguarding people from abuse. Care workers and managers knew the procedures.

The provider organisation had quality assurance audit systems in place. These included quality audit questionnaires that people are asked to complete after their six week reablement programme. We looked at a sample of these that were returned in December 2011. The responses were mainly very positive about the service. Some people made additional comments:

One person wrote 'I felt they were friends and am glad to be able to do things myself.'