• Doctor
  • GP practice

Mitcham Family Practice

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

55 Mortimer Road, Mitcham, Surrey, CR4 3HS (020) 8648 2432

Provided and run by:
Mitcham Family Practice

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Assessment report published 2 July 2026

On this page

Caring

Good

1 July 2026

We looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

At our last assessment, we rated this key question as Requires Improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed as feedback (on the national patient survey) from patients has improved.

This service scored 70 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Kindness, compassion and dignity

Score: 3

The service treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and respected their privacy and dignity. Staff treated colleagues from other organisations with kindness and respect.

Arrangements were in place to promote patients’ privacy. National GP Patient Survey data reflected people felt listened to and were treated with kindness.

Treating people as individuals

Score: 2

The service did not always make sure people’s care, support and treatment met people’s needs and preferences.

The practice had a system to assign people registering with the practice to one of the two GP partners, based on month of registration. If seeing a GP, people were usually booked with their assigned GP. We saw one example when a patient wished to register with a specific GP partner, for cultural and language reasons, but this was declined as it was not that GP’s month to be assigned patients.

Independence, choice and control

Score: 3

The service promoted people’s independence, so people knew their rights and had choice and control over their own care, treatment and wellbeing.

Staff helped patients and their carers to access advocacy and community-based services.

Responding to people’s immediate needs

Score: 3

The service listened to and understood people’s needs, views and wishes. Staff responded to people’s needs in the moment and acted to minimise any discomfort, concern or distress.

There was a system for appointment triage that ensured people with immediate needs had access to services. Staff we spoke with knew the process for referral to emergency support, including mental health crisis teams.

Workforce wellbeing and enablement

Score: 3

The service cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to deliver person-centred care.

Staff told us they were valued by leaders. Leaders had taken steps to recognise and meet the wellbeing needs of staff, which included the necessary resources and facilities for safe working, such as regular breaks and rest areas. Staff reported feeling supported. Team building social events took place.