- GP practice
Faircross Health Centre
Assessment report published 8 December 2025
Contents
On this page
- Overview
- Shared direction and culture
- Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders
- Freedom to speak up
- Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion
- Governance, management and sustainability
- Partnerships and communities
- Learning, improvement and innovation
Well-led
We looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question as Inadequate because there was a lack of clear vision and strategic direction, alongside insufficient assurance and oversight processes. In addition, resources were not effectively allocated to ensure the safe management of patients. Since then, the service has changed provider and these issues were rectified. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good.
This service scored 79 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.
The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities.
All staff had contributed to the development of the practice vision and strategy, which was kept under review and was displayed in and around the practice as well as on the practice’s website.
The practice was aware of the projected increase in the local population and was working with partner agencies to address future challenges.
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders
The service had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty.
Staff told us leaders in the practice was approachable and responded to any concerns raised. Staff also told us leaders modelled the values of the practice. We were given several examples of changes made in the practice as a result of staff feedback.
We saw the leadership team worked with other practices in the primary care network and were engaged in the development of primary care services within the local area.
Freedom to speak up
The service fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard.
The practice had established Freedom to Speak up arrangements with other practices in the primary care network. Staff were aware of how to raise concerns, and we saw policies and posters displayed around the practice to support this.
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion
The service valued diversity in their workforce. They work towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who work for them.
Policies and procedures to promote diversity and equality were in place, and all staff had completed equality and diversity training. The practice adhered to adopting flexible working arrangements and were aligned with the NHS Workforce Disability Equality Standard Workforce Race Equality Standard.
Governance, management and sustainability
The service mostly had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. They act on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and share this securely with others when appropriate. However, whilst all the information requested was available, the way it was stored did not make it easily retrievable for some members of staff.
Leaders and managers supported staff, and all staff we spoke with were clear on their individual roles and responsibilities. Managers met with staff regularly to complete appraisals and performance reviews.
Managers held regular practice meetings with staff, during which they discussed clinical concerns and emerging risks. Staff took patient confidentiality and information security seriously.
Partnerships and communities
The service clearly understood and carried out their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, and services worked seamlessly for people. They always share information and learning with partners and collaborate for improvement.
The provider worked with other practices within their primary care network to offer extended access, and flu and covid vaccination programmes. Staff had made adjustments to improve coordination of their service with community healthcare services, including through multidisciplinary meetings and outreach clinics held in the community.
The Patient Participation Group (PPG) worked with the practice to improve services for patients.
Learning, improvement and innovation
The service focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. They actively contribute to safe, effective practice and research.