• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Becoming Care Services Limited

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Image Court Unit IC122, 328 Molesey Road, Walton-on-thames, KT12 3LT (01932) 989705

Provided and run by:
Becoming Care Services Limited

Assessment report published 14 July 2026

Ratings

  • Overall

    Requires improvement

  • Safe

    Requires improvement

  • Effective

    Good

  • Caring

    Good

  • Responsive

    Requires improvement

  • Well-led

    Requires improvement

Our view of the service

Date of assessment: 16 June 2026

Becoming Care Services Limited is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to people in their own homes. Some people received a short term care package to support them to become independent again. Other people had live-in care staff who supported them around the clock. At the time of our assessment 15 people received the regulated activity of personal care.

There was a lack of robust governance or oversight of the service by management. Although the registered manager told us they reviewed aspects of the service such as care plans, daily notes and people’s medicine records, they had no evidence to support this and they told us they did not record the audits. This meant improvements that were required to the service had not been identified by the registered manager and there was a risk than on-going issues may not be identified.

People’s care plans lacked sufficient detail to ensure staff would know how to look after the person; particularly if they were staff who were unfamiliar with the people receiving the care. However, everyone who received the service was able to tell staff how they wished to be cared for.

People’s medicine records were not well kept. We found gaps in some records and where people had medicinal creams, there was a lack of clear instructions on where these should be applied. These inconsistencies may affect safe medicine administration.

Staff were not recruited through a robust process. The registered manager had assured themselves that prospective staff were suitable to work in this type of service which meant people may be at risk of receiving care from unsuitable staff.

We found the service in breach of regulations related to safe care and treatment, recruitment processes, and good governance.

Staff understood their requirements to report any safeguarding concerns, and they had been trained in the Mental Capacity Act (2005), so were aware of the need to obtain a person’s consent prior to providing care.

Staff respected people’s houses and followed good infection control practices as they removed their shoes when coming into a person’s home and wore gloves, aprons and masks.

Staff received sufficient training and felt supported by the registered manager and senior management. They told us they did not feel rushed when they were providing care to people and that they had the opportunity to meet together face to face on a regular basis.

Staff supported people to access healthcare professional input when required and encouraged people to eat and drink enough to maintain their health.

The registered manager recognised improvements were needed in the service, particularly in relation to staff timekeeping and their governance processes. It was evident they were keen to run a good service that provided appropriate care to people.

People's experience of this service

People spoke highly of staff and told us they treated them with kindness and respect. People said staff supported them with their meals and that their company improved their wellbeing.

People said staff stayed the full time they expected them to and were helpful and responsive to their needs. People felt staff knew them and understood how they liked their care.

People felt safe with staff and said staff looked after them well, treating them with care and attention. People told us they received the medicines prescribed to them by staff and had no concerns in this aspect of their care.

Whilst people’s feedback was generally positive, we identified issues relating to medicines records, care planning and governance. This created a slight difference between people’s experiences and the findings from records and oversight.

People said they could speak to management should they have any concerns and they felt they would be responsive to them.