• Care Home
  • Care home

Hylton Grange

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

1 Poole Road, Sunderland, SR4 0HG (0191) 524 1400

Provided and run by:
Hylton Grange Health Care Limited

Assessment report published 2 October 2025

On this page

Responsive

Good

19 September 2025

Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs.

At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Person-centred Care

Score: 3

Staff made sure people were at the centre of their care and treatment choices and they decided, in partnership with people, how to respond to any relevant changes in people’s needs. The ethos of the organisation promoted a person-centred culture where people were at the heart of the service and staff were committed to ensuring they received the very best possible support in a caring and nurturing environment. A relative commented, “They adapted it here to meet [Name]’s needs, they need 1 to 1 care, [Name] doesn’t walk and has pre-planned exercises.”

Care provision, Integration and continuity

Score: 3

Staff at the service understood the diverse health and care needs of people and their local communities, so care was joined-up, flexible and supported choice and continuity. Information was available and shared between services as needed to ensure people's care and treatment needs could be assessed and met. There was strong communication and liaison with other agencies involved in providing support to a person, to ensure there was joined up and seamless care.

Providing Information

Score: 3

The service advertised that it could supply appropriate, accurate and up-to-date information in formats that were tailored to individual needs, Information such as pictorial menus were available to help people make a choice where they no longer recognised the written word.

Listening to and involving people

Score: 3

The provider was good at enabling people to share feedback and ideas, or raise complaints about their care, treatment and support. Staff always involved people in decisions about their care and told them what had changed as a result. People were encouraged and supported to get involved in the running of the service. Regular meetings took place with people to consult with them and get their feedback. A person commented, “I don’t go to the residents’ meeting, but they [management] do act on things you mention.” Another person told us, “Staff ask me for my views.”

 

Equity in access

Score: 3

Staff were good at ensuring people could access the care, support and treatment they needed when they needed it. People's care records showed they had access to care and support, and referrals were made for treatment promptly. Care records included information around people's sensory and communication needs. Staff advocated for people or secured advocates for them to ensure they received the treatment and support they needed. An on-call system was in place to provide advice and support to people and staff if needed. A staff member commented, “There is an on-call rota, that provides us with 24-hour cover from senior staff. I have used it, it worked well.”

Equity in experiences and outcomes

Score: 3

Staff and leaders actively listened to information about people who were most likely to experience inequality in experience or outcomes and tailored their care, support and treatment in response to this. Care plans included information around people’s identity, things which were important to them, their wishes and relationships they wanted to maintain. The registered manager ensured peoples’ social and healthcare needs were fully considered and met. The management team were trying to introduce a regular GP ward round into the home, so there would better liaison with local surgeries to meet people’s healthcare needs in a prompt and co-ordinated way.

Planning for the future

Score: 3

People were supported to plan for important life changes, so they could have enough time to make informed decisions about their future, including at the end of their life. Care plans that were in place contained people’s plans for the future. Information was available about people's religion and cultural preferences if this support was required.