• Care Home
  • Care home

Hyllden Heights Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

140 Tonbridge Road, Hildenborough, Tonbridge, TN11 9HJ (01732) 443030

Provided and run by:
Oakland Opco B Limited

Report from 22 May 2025 assessment

Ratings

  • Overall

    Good

  • Safe

    Good

  • Effective

    Good

  • Caring

    Good

  • Responsive

    Good

  • Well-led

    Good

Our view of the service

Date of assessment: 6 August to 2 September 2025. This was the first assessment for this newly registered service. Hyllden Heights Care Home provides accommodation and personal/nursing care to up to 78 older people. At the time of our visit 77 people were using the service.

Risks to people were effectively managed to minimise the risk of potential harm. Safeguarding measures were in place to protect people from abuse. Staff knew the types of abuse and signs to recognise them. When incidents occurred, lessons were learned and shared.

Medication was administered and handled safely. Adequate staffing levels ensured people received appropriate support. Staff were well-supported and equipped to perform their roles effectively. They received training and adhered to infection control protocols. The environment was maintained to promote health and safety.

People were supported to eat a balanced diet and drink enough to keep hydrated. However, people told us they did not always like the food provided as it did not meet their requirements and preferences.

People were able to access the healthcare services necessary to support their wellbeing, with staff working collaboratively with healthcare services to ensure continuity of care. People consented to the care and treatment they received. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff were caring and kind. Staff treated people with dignity and as individuals; and their independence was promoted. Staff respected people’s privacy and supported them to maintain relationships which mattered to them.

People’s needs were not always reassessed to reflect their needs. Care plans covered people’s individual needs and how to meet them. People’s end-of-life wishes were documented in their care plans.

Complaints were handled in accordance with the provider’s established procedures. Leadership within the service was clearly evident, and they had systems in place to oversee quality and safety. However, we identified gaps where repositioning charts were not consistently completed, and some care plans did not contain people’s current circumstances that had not been detected through the provider’s audit process.

We spoke with people who use the service, their relatives, staff, and the registered manager. We received feedback from professionals involved in the service. We reviewed people’s care records, staff records and records relating to the management of the service. We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI) during lunchtime. SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.

People's experience of this service

People and their relatives expressed positive views about the service. Feedback included remarks such as, “It’s quiet and pleasant, no issues so far.”; “I feel safe, it’s bright and welcoming.” and, “The atmosphere is very positive, staff are supportive—I feel quite settled.” Others commented on the quality of communication and care, saying, “They communicate very well. We’re really pleased with the care. The activity team is excellent, with plenty of music and engaging interactions that residents enjoy.” and “Communication is strong. We receive emails and phone calls about any concerns, and our loved one can see the GP whenever needed.”

People told us they felt safe living in the home and their needs were met. People and their relatives told us there were enough staff to support them safely. They told us staff responded to their calls for assistance quickly.

People knew how to raise complaints about the service if they were unhappy or had any concerns.

People shared that they were able to visit the service and review the provided information before deciding to move in. They felt free to move around the home without restrictions. Relatives were welcome to visit at any time, and staff were described as kind and attentive to individual needs.