Sandy Mount

On this page

• Overview
• Assessing needs
• Delivering evidence-based care and treatment
• How staff, teams and services work together
• Supporting people to live healthier lives
• Monitoring and improving outcomes
• Consent to care and treatment

Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

The service made sure people’s care and treatment was effective by assessing and reviewing their health, care, wellbeing and communication needs with them.

The service planned and delivered people’s care and treatment with them, including what was important and mattered to them. They did this in line with legislation and current evidence-based good practice and standards.

We did not look at How staff, teams and services work together during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

We did not look at Supporting people to live healthier lives during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

The service routinely monitored people’s care and treatment to continuously improve it. They ensured that outcomes were positive and consistent, and that they met both clinical expectations and the expectations of people themselves.

The service told people about their rights around consent, and we observed staff obtaining consent when delivering person-centred care and treatment. Staff we spoke with had received training and showed knowledge around consent and capacity when making day to day decisions. However, the registered manager told us everyone who used the service had capacity, although information we reviewed did not support this, we identified people who could consent to everyday tasks but would not be able to make significant decisions around future care and support due to their ability to weigh up and retain information and for one person their fluctuating capacity due to confusion could impact their capacity. The registered manager has agreed to review and update consent and capacity decisions to ensure they are current and in line with current Mental Capacity Assessment legislation.