• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Shelagh Care Services Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Office 203, Suite 2, 1 Queensgate Centre, Orsett Road, Grays, RM17 5DF (01375) 267901

Provided and run by:
Shelagh Care Services Ltd

Assessment report published 8 July 2026

On this page

Well-led

Good

8 July 2026

Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion. The service focused on engagement with people and their communities gaining an understanding of their needs. The registered manager told us, “We work extremely hard together as a team to ensure we are always providing high quality care. We ensure our systems are robust, effective and efficient.” The management had clear values and had developed a listening culture where staff felt they were available for them to talk to.

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The service had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty. The registered manager was clear about their roles and had the skills, knowledge and experience to perform their job. The registered manager told us they regularly read guidance and kept up to date with any changes. A relative told us, “The manager is running the service very well and approachable, and I have no issues raising any concerns with them. If I ever have raised something, it has always been dealt with immediately.”

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

The service fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard. The registered manager had a policy and processes for staff to follow on ‘whistle blowing.’ 
The registered manager also held regular discussions with people to share their thoughts about how the service was ran and to discuss the support they received and if any improvements could be made. A member of staff told us, “We have regular meetings and supervisions with the manager which is a good opportunity for us to discuss anything with them.”

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The service valued diversity in their workforce. The service worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who worked for them. There was a policy in place to protect staff from harassment and bullying and a focus on protected characteristics under the Equality Act. The registered manager had developed an inclusive workforce and recognised the value of diversity amongst the team. The registered manager told us, “We have ensured that all staff have completed equality and inclusion training as mandatory training.”

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 3

The service had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care and support. They acted on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and shared this securely with others when appropriate. The management were in the process of devising several new audits to enhance their oversight and drive further improvements in the service. The management had given staff a clear direction of their vision for the service. Staff understood their role and contribution in sustaining improvements.

The registered manager had considered the potential risks of growth and was developing governance systems to ensure oversight remained effective as the service expanded.

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

The service understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services worked seamlessly for people. They shared information and learning with partners and collaborated for improvement. The management and staff shared the same goal to provide positive outcomes for people. The management encouraged staff to discuss and share ideas for improvement and innovation.

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The service focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. They actively contributed to safe, effective practice and research. The management was actively supporting staff with learning and innovative ways of working at the service. Staff were encouraged to develop their skills and were supported to obtain nationally recognized qualifications. One member of staff said, “I have completed lots of training including the care certificate when I first started and continue to do regular trainings. There are always opportunities for growth and development.”