• Doctor
  • Out of hours GP service

Practice Plus Group - South West London OOH/CAS

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Premises First Floor Offices, 125 Upper Richmond Road, London, SW15 2TL 0333 999 2570

Provided and run by:
Practice Plus Group Urgent Care Limited

Assessment report published 15 May 2026

On this page

Well-led

Good

15 May 2026

We looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

This is the first inspection for this service since its registration with CQC. This key question has been rated as good.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities.

All staff had contributed to the development of the service’s vision and strategy, which was kept under review.

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The service had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty.

Staff told us leaders in the service was approachable and responded to any concerns raised. Staff also told us leaders modelled the values of the service. We saw the leadership team worked with other services in the area.

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

The service fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard.

The service had established Freedom to Speak up arrangements across the provider, with a Freedom to Speak guardian in place within each or the provider’s 3 major work streams. Staff were aware of how to raise concerns.

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The service valued diversity in their workforce. They work towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who work for them.

Policies and procedures to promote diversity and equality were in place. Adjustments had been made to ensure all staff were valued.

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 3

The service had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. They act on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and share this securely with others when appropriate.

Leaders and managers supported staff, and all staff we spoke with were clear on their individual roles and responsibilities. The provider had established governance processes that were appropriate for their service, although in a small number of cases staff were not trained, or had not had Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks to the level specified in guidance. Staff could access all required policies and procedures. Managers held regular meetings with staff, during which they discussed clinical concerns and emerging risks. Managers clearly recorded any actions arising from these meetings and ensured they shared these with staff. Staff took service user confidentiality and information security seriously.

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

The service understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services work seamlessly for people. They share information and learning with partners and collaborate for improvement. This included contacting NHS GP services and other urgent care providers if the need arose.

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The service focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. They actively contribute to safe, effective practice and research.

The service had a quality improvement plan in place to help drive improvements in services. They had completed individual clinician and medicines audits. Learning was documented from the audits with actions for improvement.