• Care Home
  • Care home

Highview Lodge

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Cherry Orchard, Gadebridge, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, HP1 3SD (01442) 239733

Provided and run by:
Runwood Homes Limited

Report from 23 April 2025 assessment

Ratings

  • Overall

    Requires improvement

  • Safe

    Requires improvement

  • Effective

    Good

  • Caring

    Good

  • Responsive

    Requires improvement

  • Well-led

    Requires improvement

Our view of the service

Date of Assessment: 13 and 14 May 2025. Highview Lodge is a care home for up to 77 individuals, providing personal care and accommodation to older people and including those living with dementia. There were 59 people using the service at the time of our assessment who resided within 4 separate units, Memory Avenue, Blossom Close, Treetop Street and Orchard Lane. This assessment was carried out to assess concerns raised to the Care Quality Commission about the safety and wellbeing of people using the service.

We found 3 breaches of regulation relating to risk management, person-centred care and governance.

At the last inspection the service was rated overall as ‘Requires Improvement’. The rating at this assessment remains ‘Requires Improvement.’

During this assessment we found the provider did not ensure all risks to people’s safety and wellbeing were identified or provided enough detail as to how these should be mitigated. Not all care plans were accurate or accurately reflected all of a person’s care and support needs. Records where people could be distressed and anxious provided insufficient information relating to staffs’ interventions and people’s outcomes. Fluid intake information for individuals demonstrated fluid targets were not always maintained and there was a lack of evidence to show what was being done to monitor this. Assessments relating to people’s capacity were not routinely recorded and completed. Capacity assessments are important to understand a person’s ability to make decisions.

Lessons were not always learnt to identify and embed good practice. Although people and those acting on their behalf considered themselves and family members to be safe, improvements were required to ensure safeguarding investigations were sufficiently detailed. Not all staff had received formal supervision and where issues were raised about a member of staff’s performance, there was a lack of information as to how this was to be addressed and monitored.

Whilst people and those acting on their behalf were mostly happy with the care and support provided, not all care and support observed was person centred to meet people’s needs. Observations of staff practice did not always provide assurance staff were skilled and competent to effectively apply their learning in their everyday practice to support people safely, specifically safe moving and handling practices. Staff interactions on occasions were minimal, task focused and did not consistently ensure people were able to participate in meaningful social activities.

Governance arrangements at the service were not effective, as they did not ensure proactive action was taken to make the required changes and improvements. However, following our assessment the provider has provided the Care Quality Commission with a Service Improvement Plan. The purpose of a Service Improvement Plan is to proactively identify and monitor performance, address weaknesses in service delivery and recognise areas for improvement. Progress of the actions taken by the provider to achieve compliance has been regularly communicated to us via their updated Service Improvement Plan demonstrating progress and action taken to address identified shortfalls and to achieve compliance with regulatory requirements.

People’s needs were assessed prior to their admission to the service and people confirmed they had been involved in the process. The premises were clean and odour free. Medicine arrangements at the service were safe. The dining experience was positive across the service and people were complimentary regarding the meals provided. The service worked well with external healthcare professionals and services to ensure people’s ongoing healthcare needs were met.

We will ask the provider for an action plan to tell us how and by when they will meet the breaches of regulations identified at this assessment.

People's experience of this service

Not all people living at Highview Lodge were able to share their feedback with us about what it was like to live there. Where people could, the majority of them and relatives spoke positively about the care and support provided and the staff who provided this.

People and those acting on their behalf were generally happy with the management of the service, although some people expressed concern regarding the regular changes of management and did not always feel there were enough staff deployed at the service.People and their relatives considered themselves and their family members to be safe. People had access to healthcare services when they needed it and confirmed their healthcare needs were met. All relatives spoken with confirmed they would recommend the service to others. Comments included, “I would recommend them [Highview Lodge], it is the caring staff”, “It is a good service, I would recommend them. I would give them 8 out of 10” and “Yes, I would recommend the service.”

People’s comments regarding staffing levels were variable. However, observations during our assessment demonstrated the deployment of staff was appropriate.