• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

iSight Clinic, Hattersley House - Ormskirk

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Suite 6, Hattersley House, 1 Hattersley Court, Ormskirk, L39 2AY (01695) 660490

Provided and run by:
iSight Limited

Assessment report published 17 September 2026

On this page

Well-led

Good

17 September 2026

We looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture

This is the first assessment for this service since its registration with CQC. This key question has been rated as good.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities.

The clinic had a vision and strategy and an ethos that put patients at the heart of what they do, but also with a view on their financial sustainability. The clinic was aware of the potential changes in the healthcare landscape including commissioning and worked with partners to address changes in service provision.

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The service had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty.

Staff told us leaders in the clinic was approachable and responded to any concerns raised. Staff also told us leaders modelled the values of the clinic.

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

The service fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard.

The clinic had established Freedom to Speak representatives and staff were aware of how to raise concerns, and we saw examples where staff had used the arrangements in place to positive effect.

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The service valued diversity in their workforce. They work towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who work for them.

Policies and procedures to promote diversity and equality were in place. Adjustments had been made to ensure all staff were valued, for example we saw adjustments to support disabled staff were in place.

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 3

The service had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. They act on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and share this securely with others when appropriate.

Leaders and managers supported staff, and all staff we spoke with were clear on their individual roles and responsibilities. Managers met with staff regularly to complete appraisals and performance reviews. The provider had established governance processes that were appropriate for their service. Staff could access all required policies and procedures. Managers held regular clinic meetings with staff, during which they discussed clinical concerns and emerging risks. Managers clearly recorded any actions arising from these meetings and ensured they shared these with staff. Staff took patient confidentiality and information security seriously.

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

The service understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services work seamlessly for people. They share information and learning with partners and collaborate for improvement.

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The service focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. They actively contribute to safe, effective practice and research.

The clinic had a quality improvement plan in place to help drive improvements in services. All staff were encouraged to put forward and test out new ways of working.