• Care Home
  • Care home

Bright Meadows

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Breightmet Fold Lane, Bolton, Lancashire, BL2 6PP (01204) 392005

Provided and run by:
Harbour Healthcare 1 Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

Assessment report published 29 December 2025

Ratings

  • Overall

    Good

  • Safe

    Requires improvement

  • Effective

    Good

  • Caring

    Good

  • Responsive

    Good

  • Well-led

    Good

Our view of the service

Date of assessment: 20 October to 19 November 2025. Bright Meadows is a purpose-built care home, registered to provide care and accommodation for up to 121 people. The home provides residential, nursing, residential dementia and nursing dementia care across 5 units within the same building. At the time of the assessment 101 people were living at the home. This assessment was carried out to check whether improvements had been made since our last inspection of the service in May 2023, when it was rated requires improvement overall and in the key questions safe, effective and well-led.

The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to the management of medicines. Issues were identified with stock control, record keeping and administration of some medicines. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

Risks to people had been assessed, although records contained some contradictory information, about people’s needs and level of functioning. Guidance for staff also needed to be more specific at times. The provider took action to address these issues during the assessment. People received safe and effective care from staff who knew them and how they wished to be supported. Enough trained staff were deployed to meet needs timely. Accidents, incidents and complaints were managed appropriately and in line with the provider’s policy. The home was clean, equipment was safe to use, and ongoing checks were completed to ensure compliance with regulations.

Assessments were completed prior to admission, to ensure the provider could meet people’s needs. Staff sought people’s consent prior to providing care. Where people lacked capacity to consent, decisions had been made in their best interest. People were happy with the food and drink provided. People with special dietary requirements, such as needing pureed meals, received these in line with guidance. The provider monitored people’s health and referred people to healthcare professionals as required. However, people’s care and treatment was not always effectively monitored, to ensure identified outcomes were being achieved.

People and relatives felt the home was well-led and would recommend it to others. The provider completed a range of audits and governance processes to help monitor and drive improvements. Learning from accidents, incidents and gaps in practice was completed and shared across the staff team. Views and suggestions for improvement were sought via surveys, with feedback on actions shared via a noticeboard. The provider worked closely and collaboratively with a range of health and social care professionals and had also made links with community organisations who visited the home to provide services and activities to people. The provider had guidance for people, relatives and staff on how to speak up and raise concerns, although people had not needed to use these.

People's experience of this service

We found staff members to be helpful, welcoming and friendly. There was a calm atmosphere around the whole building. Care staff were observed to be patient, attentive to people’s needs, and caring in their approach. Overall, people and relatives feedback supported these observations. A relative stated, “I like it here, the staff are excellent, they are very kind, there is not a huge turnover of staff, so they know [relative], and she knows them.” Another relative told us, “Staff and communication are really good. The care [relative] gets is second to none.”

People told us they felt safe, and their needs were met. One person stated, “I feel safe here and feel they look after me well. There are always staff around.” Staff sought people’s consent before providing care, which included explaining what support they intended to provide and if people were okay with this. One person told us, “They always check if it’s okay before assisting me, whether it’s in the shower, with hoisting or with whatever I need.”

People were supported to stay well and had access to medical professionals as and when required. Where necessary, staff shared information following appointments with relatives. People and relatives told us communication was good, and there was no restriction on visiting, with relatives and friends able to attend the home at any time. The home had a café area next to reception, where people could meet with their relative, rather than just doing so on their respective unit. A couple of people commented on the café’s opening hours being limited, as it currently closed at 4pm. We raised this with the provider, who agreed to extend the opening times, to allow it to be used into the evening.

The majority of people and relatives we spoke with told us they would recommend the home to others. One person stated, “I would recommend this home as it’s comfortable and secure with staff around to assist at all times. I like the way that they keep my son informed of my health and of any changes too.”