• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Sk:n - London - London Wall

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

London Wall, London, EC2M 5TE (020) 3889 6756

Provided and run by:
Lasercare Clinics (Harrogate) Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Sk:n - London - London Wall on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Sk:n - London - London Wall, you can give feedback on this service.

26 September 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection September 2013 – Met all standards)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Sk:n London Wall on 26 September 2022 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008. The inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008. The practice had been inspected in 2013 under our previous methodology which did not apply ratings. This was the first rated inspection of the service under our current methodology.

Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic the Care Quality Commission (CQC) has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently. This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on-site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Speaking with staff in person and on the telephone.
  • Requesting documentary evidence from the provider.
  • A site visit.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of regulated activities and services and these are set out in Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

The provider specialises in dermatology treatments and is led by independent doctors. The service offers a mix of regulated skin treatments and minor surgical procedures, as well as other non-regulated aesthetic treatments.

Sk:n London Wall provides a wide range of non-surgical aesthetic interventions, for example, laser hair removal and dermal fillers which are not within the CQC scope of registration. Therefore, we did not inspect or report on these services. Sk:n London Wall is registered with the Care Quality Commission to provide the following regulated activities: Treatment of Disease, Disorder and Injury; Diagnostic and screening procedures; and Surgical Procedures.

The service had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have a legal responsibility for meeting the

requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • Leaders and staff had the skills and experience to fulfil their roles in a safe and effective way.
  • The provider had comprehensive governance processes to provide assurance to leaders that systems were safe and operating as intended.
  • Risk management was deeply embedded in the culture of the service, we saw evidence the provider made improvements when risks were identified.
  • There were safeguarding systems and processes to keep people safe.
  • There were appropriate arrangements in place to manage medical emergencies.
  • Recruitment checks had been carried out in accordance with regulations.
  • There were health and safety risk assessments and processes in place.
  • The service proactively sought feedback from patients and used this information to monitor and improve the service.
  • The provider had an effective complaints procedure with an up to date complaints policy which was accessible by all staff.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

13 September 2013

During a routine inspection

We were not able to speak to people using the service because no one was available when we visited. However, the provider had obtained feedback from people who had used the service. This showed that most people were satisfied with their consultation and treatment at the clinic.

We found completed treatment plans for each person who had signed their treatment plan to confirm the details were correct and show that they had consented to treatment. The clinic lead nurse spoke with us and said that it was part of their role to review and verify that treatment plans were properly completed and that the suggested course of cosmetic treatment was appropriate.

The clinic was clean and well maintained. There were systems in place to reduce the risk of infection.

The treatment rooms are accessed via a flight of stairs. The clinic lead nurse told us that when clients make contact with the clinic this is explained to them.

We found that each member of staff was suitably qualified to carry out their role.

9 October 2012

During a routine inspection

We were not able to speak to people using the service because there were none present when we visited. However, the provider had obtained feedback from people who had used the service. This showed that most people were very satisfied with their consultation and treatment at the clinic. Staff providing laser treatment had undertaken training that enabled them to provide this treatment safely. The provider had effective systems in place to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that people received.