• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Old Friends Care

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

5 Regents Court, Far Moor Lane Winyates Green, Redditch, Worcestershire, B98 0SD (01527) 525583

Provided and run by:
Helena McNally

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

27 June 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Old Friends Care is a service providing personal care to people in their own homes. The service supports people with all types of needs. One hundred and fifteen people were supported with their care needs at the time of the inspection.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People were exceptionally positive about the staff who cared for them and told us staff’s kindly and warm approach enhanced their lives and well-being. Staff valued the bonds they had built with the people they cared for and knew people exceptionally well. Staff were encouraged to provide exceptionally kind care by the culture set by senior staff. This included recognising and celebrating when staff provided exceptional care to people. People told us staff often went the extra mile to support them and their relatives and to show them they were valued. People were empowered to make their own decisions because of the culture of the service and the way they were cared for. Staff advocated for people, where people wanted this. This had led to improvements in people’s lives. People and relatives highlighted staff were respectful and care was provided sensitively by staff, so people’s dignity needs were met.

People were supported to manage their safety and reduce risks they experienced. People’s wider safety needs and desire for independence was considered by staff. People could rely on staff to provide them with them they had planned together. There were sufficient staff to care for people, and staff noticed if people needed extra help. People’s medicines were managed safely, and checks were made to ensure they were administered as prescribed. Staff took learning from any concerns and incidents, so risks to people were further reduced.

People decided what care they wanted, and care plans reflected people’s preferences and needs. Relatives views were sought on the care planned for their family members, when people wanted this. Staff took action to support people to communicate their wishes, and to involve people in reviewing their care. This helped to ensure people were fully included in discussions and were able to make informed choices about their care. People had confidence any concerns or complaints would be promptly addressed. Staff sensitively supported people at the end of their lives. This support was extended to relatives and staff. The manager planned to further develop their understanding of people’s preferences in respect of their end of life care.

People benefited from receiving a service where there was a commitment to developing staff skills and supporting them. People were supported by staff to access help from other health and social care professionals, so they would enjoy the best well-being possible. People’s food and drink preferences were met. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People, relatives and staff were positive about the way the service was led, and how staff were guided to focused on people’s needs they cared for. The manager, senior staff and provider checked the quality of the care provided and worked with people, relatives and other organisations to drive through improvements to people’s care.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was Good. (Published 10 August 2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

11 July 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of this service on 17 and 18 May 2016. After this inspection we received concerns in relation to staffing levels and how people’s care was managed. As a result we undertook a focused inspection to look into those concerns on 11 July 2017. This report only covers our findings in relation to these topics.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Old Friends Care on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

The inspection took place on 11 July 2017 and was announced. We gave the provider 48 hours’ of our intention to undertake the inspection. This was because the service provides domiciliary care to people in their own homes and we needed to make sure someone would be available at the office.

Old Friends Care is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care to people living in their own homes. A registered provider was in charge when we inspected the service. Registered providers are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. At the time of our inspection 105 people received care and support services.

A registered provider was in charge when we inspected the service. Registered providers are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People we spoke with told us they felt safe with staff supporting them. Staff were able to tell us of the needs of the people they provided care for and their roles and responsibilities in keeping people safe. Staff understood how to protect people from abuse and were clear about the steps they would need to take if they suspected someone was unsafe.

Staff had been recruited following appropriate checks and the provider had arrangements in place to make sure that there were sufficient care staff to provide support to people. People had their individual risks assessed and had plans in place to manage them, these had been updated to reflect any changes in a person’s wellbeing. Medicines were administered by staff that had received training. The provider had procedures in place to monitor that people received their medicines to safely.

People said the service was well managed and the management team were approachable. Staff felt supported by the management team and knew what was expected of them to provide good care. The provider ensured regular checks were completed to monitor the quality of the care that people received and action had been taken where areas were identified for improvement. The provider looked for ways to continually develop and further improve the service.

People and their relative’s spoke positively about provider and the care and support they received.

17 May 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection was announced and took place on 17 and 18 May 2016. We gave the provider 48 hours’ of our intention to undertake the inspection. This was because the service provides domiciliary care to people in their own homes and we needed to make sure someone would be available at the office.

Old Friends Care is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care to people living in their own homes. A registered provider was in charge when we inspected the service. Registered providers are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. At the time of our inspection 143 people received care and support services.

People said they were safe and they were cared for by staff who had a clear understanding of the risks associated with people’s needs. Staff demonstrated knowledge of the different types of potential abuse and how they should respond. People had their individual risks assessed and had plans in place to manage them. Medicines were administered by care staff that had received training. The registered provider had procedures in place to monitor that people received their medicines to safely meet their health needs.

Care staff had been recruited following appropriate checks and the registered provider had arrangements in place to make sure that there were sufficient care staff to provide support to people in their own homes. People told us they received reliable care from a regular team of staff who understood their preferences for care and support.

People told us they were listened to and were involved in making decisions about their care. Care staff understood they could only care for and support people who consented to being cared for. People told us they were happy with the way in which care staff supported them to choose and prepare meals.

People told us they received support from caring staff and the registered provider arranged opportunities for people to meet up and socialise together. People told us that staff treated them with privacy and dignity and supported them to maintain their independence.

People were encouraged by the provider to express their views and give feedback about their care. People said staff listened to them and they felt confident they could raise any issues should the need arise and action would be taken.

Care staff felt supported by the manager and registered provider and that they were given opportunity to progress. The manager was committed to developing new initiatives to support the care provided to people.

The registered provider ensured regular checks were completed to monitor the quality of care that people received and look at where improvements could be made. They encouraged an open office where staff could ‘pop in at any time’ and staff confirmed that they could ‘count on support from the office’.

People were positive about the care and support they received and the service as a whole.

26 September 2013

During a routine inspection

During this inspection we spoke with seven people who used the service about their experiences of the support they had received. We also spoke with seven of the care staff, the provider and the registered manager.

All the people we spoke with who used the service spoke positively about the care they received. One person told us that Old friends was: 'The best agency that I have had'. All the people we spoke with told us that the care staff who supported them understood their care needs. People told us that their wishes were always listened to and we found that the provider made sure people consented to any care.

We found that the provider had taken the necessary actions to ensure that people who used the service were safeguarded against abuse.

We found that the provider had the necessary assurances and checks to make sure that staff employed had been able to carry out their job roles safely and effectively.

We saw that the provider had systems in place to monitor the quality of the service. We also saw that where required the provider took action to improve the service quality.

24 October 2012

During a routine inspection

During this inspection we spoke with three people who used the service and two relatives about their experiences of the support they had received. We also spoke with six of the staff.

All of the people we spoke with who used the service spoke positively about the care they received. One person told us that the care was, 'Marvellous, I couldn't' wish for anything better'. A relative told us that they were, 'Happy with the care they give'.

All of the people we spoke with told us that the care workers who supported them understood their care needs, treated them with dignity and respect and had the knowledge and skills to support them safely.

Staff employed at the service had access to further training and told us that they felt supported by their peers and the registered manager. One staff member said that, "Training is really good'. Another said, "Good support is always around". This meant that staff had the support and knowledge to meet the care and welfare needs of people who lived there.

We saw that the provider had systems in place to monitor and assess the quality of services being provided. Feedback was regularly sought from the people using the service, families and staff. The managers regularly observed the care staff carrying out tasks and they would also seek feedback from the people who used the service. This meant that the provider was able to review the quality of the service and to ensure appropriate care was being provided.