• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Burgess Field

57 Wornington Road, North Kensington, London, W10 5PT (020) 8960 0273

Provided and run by:
Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea

All Inspections

23 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with five people during our inspection. They were all happy living in the service. They told us staff were 'very kind', 'polite and courteous' and 'always treated them with dignity'. People were involved in planning their care and felt they were able to make choices about how their care was delivered.

People's needs were assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual care plan. One of the mangers in the service assessed the person's suitability to establish if the service could meet their needs. People's needs were reviewed six weeks after they moved in to ensure that their care was 'effective' in practice. We looked at five people's files. All the files had care plans and we saw that staff recorded their daily interactions with people appropriately.

There were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection. Staff wore protective equipment such as aprons and gloves during the delivery of care and changed them for each person.

All staff had completed national vocation qualification level two and three in social care. Staff received regular supervision every four to six weeks. Appraisals were carried out on an annual basis.

People's views about the service were collected via an annual tenants' survey and quarterly tenants meetings. Managers carried out spot checks on staff to assess the quality of their service.

27 September 2012

During a routine inspection

People who use the service told us that they consented to the care that was delivered to them and staff only carried out activities that they were "happy for them to do". The provider carried out decision-specific Mental Capacity Assessments on people who it was felt lacked the capacity to make certain decisions.

Staff assessed the needs and risks of people using the service. Each person had an individual care plan which was based on their assessed needs and risks. People using the service told us that they were satisfied with the quality of care they received. Staff were described as being "very helpful" and being "kind and considerate". One person said they "did not want to leave" Burgess Field.

People using the service told us that they felt safe at the home and if they had concerns they would report it to the person in charge. Staff we spoke with knew how to recognise the signs of abuse and how they should be reported internally.

People using the service told us that there needs were always attended to by staff and they felt that there were adequate numbers of staff working at the home.

Staff made records that were clear, concise and legible. Daily communication sheets of care were kept by staff in people's apartments and transferred periodically to the office for safe keeping.

9 December 2011

During a routine inspection

The people we spoke with all lived independently in their own accommodation within Burgess Field extra care service. People we spoke with had different levels of support from help with personal care to a daily visit or check from staff. People said that staff respected their wishes and treated them with respect. People who receive assistance with personal care said they preferred a visit from the staff at Burgess Field, rather than the agency care staff who helped them occasionally.

People were aware that care notes were kept in a folder in their accommodation. People said that they were not interested in the care plan and that they knew what to expect from staff.

People said they felt safe. People did not have any concerns or complaints but if they did they would talk to the manager of Burgess Field.