Archived: Ravenswood Care Home

15 The Avenue, Kidsgrove, Stoke On Trent, Staffordshire, ST7 1AQ (01782) 783124

Provided and run by:
Mr and Mrs Johal

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

16 October 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this inspection to check that the service was now compliant with the outcomes where concerns were identified at the last inspection of 3 May 2012.

We spoke with six people using the service, three staff, the providers, two relatives and health and social care professionals. People we spoke with told us that they were happy with the service they received. One person said, "I chose to come here to give my relative a rest. It was a difficult decision but one I haven't regretted". Another told us, "The staff here are marvellous and so kind".

Records showed that people's needs were assessed prior to admission to the service. Care information and risk assessments where a risk had been identified were in place to ensure that staff had the information they needed to maintain people's welfare.

There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service; this included seeking the views of people who used the service and their supporters. We saw that action was being taken to develop and constantly improve the service, based upon the outcome of any audits of surveys.

Records we looked at were appropriately managed and stored.

3 May 2012

During an inspection in response to concerns

We visited Ravenswood Residential Care Home as part of our schedule of planned visits and also because we had been informed of concerns about the care people received.

Before our visit we contacted other people who may have had an interest in the service such as fire safety officers, environmental health, and local involvement networks (LINks). LINks are groups of individual members of the public and local voluntary and community groups who work together to improve health and social care services. To do this they gather the views of local people. It was through discussions with other agencies and from information we hold about the service we became aware of concerns.

Since our last visit to this service the provider has registered additional beds in a new extension to the home, this means that the service could now accommodate up to 53 people.

There were 42 people living at the home when we visited on 03 May 2012. The visit was unannounced which meant the provider and the staff did not know we were visiting. For part of our visit we were accompanied by an expert by experience. An expert by experience is some one who uses services, or has had experience of services. They are people of all ages, with different experiences and from diverse cultural backgrounds. Our expert by experience took some notes and wrote a report about what they found. They observed that interaction between staff and people using the service was seen to be caring and compassionate and that people had said they felt that they were treated with dignity and respect.

During the visit we spoke with people living at the home, family and friends who were

visiting and staff members. One person living at the home told us, "Staff are very nice,

polite and very helpful".

We looked at the plans of care for six people living at the home and found that there were some gaps in the information we looked at, and in three examples care plans or risk assessments had not been developed potentially putting people at risk of harm.

There was little evidence that six people had been involved in the development of care plans or in decisions about their treatment.

We viewed staff files during our visit and found that the organisation had a process for

recruitment and training. The provider told us all staff employed by Ravenswood Residential Care Home were subjected to appropriate checks prior to commencing their role.

We saw that the systems to monitor and audit the quality of the service and delivery of care were not well established, therefore the provider was not able to demonstrate that there was a plan to continually improve the standard of service provided.

The home was clean and tidy, dedicated domestic staff were employed and the home was generally clean and tidy, but systems for assessing and monitoring the potential risk and the prevention, detection, and control of infection were not in place. Potentially putting people at risk.

23 November 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Prior to this review we had visited the home on two occasions to assess compliance. During the review we completed in June 2011, we found that the service had not complied with outcome two, consent to care and treatment. Outcome four, care and welfare of people who use services. Outcome seven, safeguarding people who use services from abuse. Outcome nine, management of medicines and outcome 13, staffing.

During the review we had completed in September 2011, we found that the service had complied with all expect outcome nine. We saw that further work was necessary to evidence that the service was compliant with the management of medicines and to ensure that people received their medication safely. Since that visit we have been provided with an improvement plan informing us that the service had made changes to address the concerns we had raised.

During our visit of 23 November 2011 to monitor compliance. We spoke with the providers, staff and the management, looked at records of medication, storage and stock control systems. We saw that medication was being managed, stored and administered safely. We concluded at this visit that the provider was now compliant with outcome nine, management of medicines.

28 June 2011

During a routine inspection

People able to express a view told us that they were involved in decisions about their care and treatment.

The husband of a person recently admitted said he was delighted with the care provided for his wife and visits daily. He is involved in discussions and kept informed of progress. When asked he said he was not aware of the care planning process.

A person being taken home by his family at the end of 2 weeks respite care said he had had "a wonderful time" and would have liked to have stayed longer. He was more than happy with the care provided and "really enjoyed the company" in the home. When asked about food he said "there is always a choice, you can ask for anything you want and the quality of the food is excellent. I have had a Full English breakfast every day". He and his family talked about a "Five Star service". The relative said they had "Even had a committee meeting (residents meetings) that staff were not allowed to attend". The relative had been included in the meeting being run by the Activities Coordinator and a means of seeking views directly from residents.

A visiting District Nurse who has visited the home regularly over a period of years told us that all staff were very co-operative with a good joint working approach. Staff follow instructions given and make early referrals if there are concerns about health care issues. She had confidence in the staff to monitor heatlh care issues.

People we spoke with told us that they feel safe at Ravenswood.

People spoke very positively about the home and particularly about staff and their commitment. This included visiting relatives, one person said "this is an excellent home, I know because we have had experience of other homes, the staff here are wonderful, they work hard and just want to do their best for the residents".

26 September 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this visit to review the progress the provider had made towards being compliant with the regulations, because we had identified areas of concern at our last review. The provider had provided us with an action plan to show us how they were to become compliant. We concluded at this visit that the provider had made progress and some improvements but was not yet compliant in all outcomes.

We looked at a number of records during our visit, spoke to staff, the provider, manager and people who use the service. We observed people using the service and the interaction between them and the staff supporting them.

Not all of the people we spoke with were able to provide us with an opinion, but we observed that people appeared to be happy in their surroundings and staff were sensitive to their needs. One person said, "The staff really take care of you here, nothing is too much trouble." Another told us, "I feel safe here and my relatives don't have to worry about me."