• Care Home
  • Care home

Bloomfield Court

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

27 Central Avenue, Tipton, West Midlands, DY4 9RR (0121) 521 5747

Provided and run by:
Anchor Hanover Group

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

Assessment report published 29 March 2026

Ratings

  • Overall

    Good

  • Safe

    Good

  • Effective

    Requires improvement

  • Caring

    Good

  • Responsive

    Good

  • Well-led

    Good

Our view of the service

Date of assessment: 09 February to 17 February 2026.

Bloomfield Court provides accommodation for a maximum of 48 people, including people living with dementia and requiring personal and nursing care. There were 45 people living at the home when we visited.

The last rating for Bloomfield Court under the previous provider was good. This provider was registered with us on 06 May 2021, and this is their first assessment. The overall rating following this assessment for Bloomfield Court is good.

We found a clean, presentable and well-maintained home environment. A safeguarding policy was in place, which staff understood, and people were treated with kindness and understanding. Some staff had a good awareness of people’s needs, which they demonstrated in how they supported people. People and staff knew how to raise concerns and people told us they were happy with their care. People had Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), where these were required, and staff were Mental Capacity Act (MCA) trained and mostly sought the consent of people when providing them care.

We found accidents and incidents had not always been analysed for understanding and learning, staff had not always received relevant training relevant to people’s needs and care records did not always provide information which accurately reflected people’s needs and risks.

People's experience of this service

People told us they felt safe and happy living at the home, and they knew how to complain about the care they received should they need to.

People appeared comfortable in their home environment and with the staff who supported them. There were some good and positive interactions with staff, with people being observed comfortably engaging with staff while receiving emotional support and when undertaking activities.

People were involved in their care. The individual choices and routines of people were promoted and respected by staff, such as around when and how people were supported at mealtimes. People’s views about their care was sought on a regular basis by leaders.

Relatives said people received good and safe care from staff, and no concerns were raised about the care people received.