You are here

Bradfield Residential Home is rated Outstanding by the Care Quality Commission

Published:
23 December 2015
Categories:
  • Media

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has rated the quality of care provided by Mr David & Mrs Brenda Johnson at Bradfield Residential Home as Outstanding.

Bradfield Residential Home in Hawksdown, Deal, Kent, is family run service and provides care and support for up to 32 older people, some of whom are living with dementia.

CQC carried out an unannounced inspection at the home in September this year and has rated the service as Outstanding overall. The home has been rated as Outstanding for providing services that are responsive and well led, and Good for providing services that are safe, effective and responsive.

Under CQC’s new programme of inspections, all adult social care services are being given a rating according to whether they are safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led.

A full report of the inspection has been published today at www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-112217665.

Deborah Ivanova, Interim Deputy Chief Inspector for Adult Social Care in the South, said:

“We found the care being provided at Bradfield Residential Home to be outstanding. The staff should feel proud of the work they do and the care they are providing to people they support.

“What really struck us about this service was the level of personalised support that people received, from staff who had the right skills and who treated people with great kindness. People told us they liked the staff who supported them.

“People should always be cared for by services that are safe, effective, caring, responsive to their needs, and well led. I’d encourage other providers to read this report, and the others we have published on services we have rated Outstanding, to see what they can learn.”

Inspectors found people were cared for by a motivated and well trained team of staff who showed a clear commitment to providing individualised and personalised support.

Staff had an excellent understanding of people’s individual needs. People received consistent, personalised care, treatment and support. They were involved in identifying their needs, choices and preferences and how they would be met. People’s care and support was reviewed, with their input.

The managers continually strived to improve the service and their own practice. The managers used creative and innovative methods of involving people in the service.

There was a high level of understanding of the need to make sure people were safe. People and staff told us they were actively encouraged to raise their concerns no matter how small. They said this was part of day to day practice. People felt comfortable in complaining if they had to. They said if they did complain they knew their complaint would be taken seriously and looked into and action taken to resolve them. The manager’s actively sought people’s views and opinions. People told us the managers always asked if everything was alright and if there was anything they needed or were not happy about.

A wide range of activities were available, based on people’s suggestions and requests, which people’s family and friends were invited to take part in. Spontaneous activities took place and entertainment was provided. On the day of our inspection people were entertained by a musician. People joined in the songs and they enjoyed the event. People were supported to do what they wanted when they wanted. People led a fulfilled and meaningful life. Staff spent quality time with people to give them emotional support and comfort. Staff reminisced with people about their life and discussed what was happening in the world.

The chefs provided good quality food and catered for people’s individual preferences. This included people’s specific health and dietary requirements. Food and drink was available to people throughout a 24 hour period. Staff gave excellent and discreet support to those who required extra help in eating and drinking. One person said, “We have lovely dinners, if you don’t like something they get you something else.”

Ends

For further information please contact CQC Regional Engagement Manager, John Scott on 07789875809. Journalists wishing to speak to the press office outside of office hours can find out how to contact the team here. Please note: the press office is unable to advise members of the public on health or social care matters.

For general enquiries, please call 03000 61 61 61.

Last updated:
29 May 2017

Notes to editors

 

CQC has published a full report detailing the findings of their inspection at: www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-112217665.

 

In October 2014, CQC began to roll out its new inspection regime for adult social care services across England, using specialist teams who will inspect and rate services against what matters to the people who use them. For further information, please visit: www.cqc.org.uk/content/making-mum-test-real-cqc-sets-out-its-new-model-inspecting-adult-social-care 

 

Since 1 April, providers have been required by law to display their ratings on their premises and on their websites so that the public can see their rating quickly and easily. This should be done within 21 days of publication of their inspection report. For further information on the display of CQC ratings, please visit: www.cqc.org.uk/content/display-ratings

 

About the Care Quality Commission

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is the independent regulator of health and social care in England.


We make sure health and social care services provide people with safe, effective, compassionate, high-quality care and we encourage care services to improve.


We monitor, inspect and regulate services to make sure they meet fundamental standards of quality and safety and we publish what we find to help people choose care.