We carried out a review of the data available to us about St Stephens Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about St Stephens Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.
This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection November 2014 – Good)
The key questions are rated as:
Are services safe? – Good
Are services effective? – Good
Are services caring? – Good
Are services responsive? – Good
Are services well-led? - Good
We carried out an announced inspection at St Stephens Surgery on 8 May 2018 as part of our inspection programme.
At this inspection we found:
•The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
•The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
•Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
•Patients found the appointment system easy to use.
•There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.
•There was a strong emphasis on the safety and well-being of all staff.
However we found one area where the provider should make improvements:
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice
We inspected this service on 13 November 2014 as part of our new comprehensive inspection programme.
The overall rating for this service is good. We found the practice to be good in the safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led domains. We found the practice provided good care to older people, people with long term conditions, families, children and young people, the working age population and those recently retired, people in vulnerable circumstances and people experiencing poor mental health.
Our key findings were as follows:
· Patients were kept safe because there were arrangements in place for staff to report and learn from key safety risks. The practice had a system in place for reporting, recording and monitoring significant events over time.
· There were systems in place to keep patients safe from the risk and spread of infection.
· Evidence we reviewed demonstrated that patients were satisfied with how they were treated and that this was with compassion, dignity and respect. It also demonstrated that the GPs were good at listening to patients and gave them enough time.
· The practice had an open culture that was effective and encouraged staff to share their views through staff meetings and significant event meetings.
In addition the provider should:
· The recruitment policy should also cover clinical staff and make reference to all of the information required to be obtained as required under Regulation 21, Schedule 3 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.
Chief Inspector of General Practice