• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: 2 Dover Street

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2 Dover Street, Coventry, West Midlands, CV1 3DB (024) 7623 2942

Provided and run by:
Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

11 April 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 11 April 2016 and was announced. We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of our inspection. This was because management and staff could be out. We wanted to make sure they were available to speak with. This service was last inspected on 2 December 2011 when it was found that not all records of individual wishes of tenants are dated or up to date. This was in breach or Regulation 9 HSCA 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010. We asked the provider to send us an action plan stating how they would improve this. The provider did complete an action plan and we saw at this inspection that all of the actions had been completed.

2 Dover Street is a supported living service registered to provide personal care to people living in their own homes . 2 Dover Street is the office where the registered manager and staff arrange the care for people who live in their own homes. At the time of our inspection there were 12 people who used the service. They received personal care and social support in order to promote their independence.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Recruitment checks were carried out prior to care workers starting work, to ensure their suitability to work with people. Only those staff who were deemed suitable to work with people who used the service were offered employment.

People’s assessed care needs were met by suitably trained and qualified staff. Medicines were given by staff who had received specialised training. Their competency to do this safely was regularly assessed.

Staff knew how to keep people safe. They received training to understand safeguarding procedures and how to recognise signs of abuse. They knew to report any suspected incident of harm to the appropriate authorities.

People were supported in line with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act. The manager understood the importance applying for Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLs) when necessary. Staff ensured they maintained people’s privacy and dignity, and treated people with compassion and respect.

Staff knew people’s needs, and their levels of independence, well. Appropriate risk management strategies were in place to reduce the risks of people falling, being at risk outside of their homes and receiving medicines. People’s needs were assessed by staff who knew them well. Support was planned in a way to ensure that the service was able to safely meet these needs. People and their relatives were involved in this process in defining and agreeing their care needs .

People were supported to see a range of health care professionals.

People had a choice of meals that met their dietary requirements and preferences . We saw that when people were able to staff supported them to prepare their own meals.

Staff had been trained to meet the specific needs of people who used the service. Staff told us they were supported within their job roles.

People and relatives were provided with information about how to report any concerns or compliments. Relatives told us they were confident that actions would be taken in response to complaints.

A range of effective audit and quality assurance procedures were in place. The provider ensured the CQC was notified about events they were required, by law, to do so.

1 December 2011

During a routine inspection

We visited the office where the service is based, and spoke with the manager and team leaders, and looked at a sample of care plans of people using the service. We spoke with two users of the service on the phone, as well as a member of staff, and three relatives of people who use the service.

We had been informed that the Trust were undertaking a 'fact finding' investigation of the service, following safeguarding concerns around the reported practice of staff using food belonging to users of the service, as well as two incidents where staff alleged that other staff had behaved in an abusive manner towards users of the service.

The response from people either using the service or with an outside involvement in it was very positive. One person said they 'loved it here', another said it was 'fine'. Comments from relatives included 'fantastic', 'we're very happy with it' and 'no problems at all'.

Another praised the consistent approach of the staff and service, although one person expressed concern about the use of agency staff, which they felt could lead to uncertainty and inconsistency. The manager was aware of this recent concern, and was planning to recruit further as necessary to overcome this difficulty.

Plans and discussion with staff and management showed clear plans and guidance in place to safeguard people, whilst allowing them independence and access to the community and their own environment, in accordance with assessed risks.