• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Moorings Nursing Home

Overall: Inadequate read more about inspection ratings

167 Thorney Bay Road, Canvey Island, Essex, SS8 0HN

Provided and run by:
Moorings Care Home Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 16 February 2021

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.

Inspection team

The inspection team was made up of one inspector

Service and service type

Moorings is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided. However, at the time of the inspection, they were not in the service and did not have day to day control of what was taking place.

Notice of inspection

We gave a short period notice of the inspection because some of the people using it could not consent to a home visit from an inspector. This meant that we had to arrange for a ‘best interests’ decision about this.

What we did before the inspection

We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the local authority and professionals who work with the service. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We used all of this information to plan our inspection

We used all of this information to plan our inspection.

After the inspection

We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We looked at medication records and quality assurance records

Overall inspection

Inadequate

Updated 16 February 2021

About the service

Moorings Nursing Home is registered to provide care and accommodation with nursing care for up to 39 people some of whom may be living with dementia and/or mental health conditions. When we inspected there were 17 people living in the service.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

During the inspection we identified serious concerns about Infection Prevention and Control (IPC). This included concerns about the cleanliness of the service and poor practice in the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), which placed people at the risk of infection. We met with the provider setting out the urgent nature of our concerns and asked them how they would address this.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission at the time of inspection, however they had not been in charge of the day to day running of the service and failed to have oversight.

We found the provider’s governance and oversight system were not robust and did not identify areas of concern in order to effectively mitigate the risks identified on inspection.

The provider failed to act where harm had been identified, to keep people safe. This included failing to raise safeguarding referrals with the local authority. The service had also failed to notify the CQC of safeguarding concerns, which is a legal obligation for providers so CQC can monitor the safety and quality of care.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 30 November 2017).

Why we inspected

We received concerns in relation to infection prevention and control. As a result, we undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of safe and well-led only.

We reviewed the information we held about the service. No areas of concern were identified in the other key questions. We therefore did not inspect them. Ratings from previous comprehensive inspections for those key questions were used in calculating the overall rating at this inspection. The overall rating for the service has changed from Good to Inadequate. This is based on the findings at this inspection.

We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements. Please see the Safe and Well Led sections of this full report.

You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of this full report.

Enforcement

We have identified breaches in relation to infection prevention control, the environment and good governance of the service

Full information about CQC’s regulatory response to the more serious concerns found during inspections is added to reports after any representations and appeals have been concluded.

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

We will request an action plan for the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

The overall rating for this service is ‘Inadequate’ and the service is therefore in ‘special measures’. This means we will keep the service under review and, if we do not propose to cancel the provider’s registration, we will re-inspect within 6 months to check for significant improvements.

If the provider has not made enough improvement within this timeframe. And there is still a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall rating, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures. This will mean we will begin the process of preventing the provider from operating this service. This will usually lead to cancellation of their registration or to varying the conditions the registration.

For adult social care services, the maximum time for being in special measures will usually be no more than 12 months. If the service has demonstrated improvements when we inspect it, and it is no longer rated as inadequate for any of the five key questions, it will no longer be in special measures.