• Care Home
  • Care home

West Banbury Cottages

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Broadwoodwidger, Lifton, Devon, PL16 0JJ (01566) 780423

Provided and run by:
Bornel Care Limited

All Inspections

18 January 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

West Banbury Cottages is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided. The home provides accommodation and personal care for up to 15 adults who have a learning disability.

We found the following examples of good practice.

Facilities were in place to wash hands or use hand sanitiser on entering and leaving West Banbury Cottages. Visitors were supported to wear a face covering when visiting, and wash hands before/after use. All visitors were screened for symptoms of COVID-19 before being allowed to enter the service. There was prominent signage and instructions to explain what people should do to ensure safety. Information was easily accessible on arrival and before visits to ensure visitors followed guidance, procedures and protocols to ensure compliance with infection prevention control.

The registered manager communicated with people, staff and health and social care professionals regularly to make sure everyone had an understanding of precautions being taken, and how to keep people safe. The service was following government guidance regards to visitors. Relative comments, “(Relative) has been kept safe and well cared for through this awful time. (Registered manager) has interpreted the guidance to meet the best interests of (relative) and the other residents which we have been so thankful for. The staff have worked so hard to support the residents through this. All of the infection control practices and measures that have been put in place have protected (relative), the other residents and the staff”, “(Registered manager) was clear and informed us in writing that they were rigorously adhering to infection prevention and control measures. If we were planning a visit to the site, we would have to ring ahead and inform them. Everyone had to complete an LFD test and evidence needed to be provided. They asked us to continue having weekly PCR tests even though we are fully vaccinated, we were already doing this and happy to continue” and “The way in which (registered manager) and her team have enabled us to visit our son whenever rules allowed has been invaluable for our mental wellbeing and his. They should be commended for their efforts.”

Staff were following current infection prevention and control guidance to help people to stay safe. There were suitable risk assessments and an up to date infection control policy and procedure in place. The registered manager ensured staff understood why every measure was essential.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was readily available around the buildings. We saw there was a good supply of PPE for staff to use. Staff were observed to be wearing PPE appropriately and disposed of it in clinical waste bins. Whole home testing was undertaken, with frequency of testing people and staff in line with current guidance.

Staff had completed training to ensure safe infection prevention and control measure were in place and knew how to keep people safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Infection prevention and control audits were carried out to ensure the premises was meeting infection control measures. A cleaning schedule for all areas of the service was in place and implemented to ensure the whole service was effectively cleaned on a regular basis. In addition, the service had implemented an infection control tracker in all areas which required regular cleaning and sanitising throughout the day, including high touch points.

Staff supported people to occupy themselves whilst maintaining their safety. Staff helped people to stay in touch with their friends and family. Alternative forms of maintaining social contact were used for friends and relatives; for example: keeping in touch using video calls.

13 August 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

The service was a large home, bigger than most domestic style properties. It was registered for the support of up to 15 people. This is larger than current best practice guidance. However. the size of the service having a negative impact on people was mitigated by the layout of the site. West Banbury Cottages provides accommodation and personal care for up to 15 young adults with learning disabilities who enjoy an active outdoor lifestyle. The service consists of 10 cottages. At the time of our inspection there were 14 people living at West Banbury Cottages.

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

The Secretary of State has asked the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to conduct a thematic review and to make recommendations about the use of restrictive interventions in settings that provide care for people with or who might have mental health problems, learning disabilities and/or autism. Thematic reviews look in-depth at specific issues concerning quality of care across the health and social care sectors. They expand our understanding of both good and poor practice and of the potential drivers of improvement.

As part of thematic review, we carried out a survey with the registered manager at this inspection. This considered whether the service used any restrictive intervention practices (restraint, seclusion and segregation) when supporting people.

The service used positive behaviour support principles to support people in the least restrictive way. No restrictive intervention practices were used.

The service provided safe care to people. A relative commented: “(Relative) is safe and happy at West Banbury.” Medicines were safely managed on people’s behalf.

Care files were personalised to reflect people’s personal preferences. People were supported to maintain a balanced diet. Health and social care professionals were regularly involved in people’s care to ensure they received the care and treatment which was right for them.

Staff relationships with people were caring and supportive. Relatives commented: “They (staff) really look after my son” and “I will say we are very happy with the care and service provided by West Banbury. The transformation in our son since he has been in their care has been so comforting.” Staff treated people with dignity and respect when helping them with daily living tasks. The service ensured people led meaningful and fulfilled lives.

There were effective staff recruitment and selection processes in place. People received effective care and support from staff who were well trained and competent.

Staff spoke positively about communication and how the registered manager worked well with them and encouraged their professional development.

A number of methods were used to assess the quality and safety of the service people received and continuous improvements were made in response to the findings.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection: The last rating for this service was Good (report published in March 2017).

Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for West Banbury Cottages on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Follow up: We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

13 February 2017

During a routine inspection

West Banbury Cottages provides accommodation and personal care for up to 15 young adults with learning disabilities who enjoy an active outdoor lifestyle. The service consists of eight cottages with an onsite swimming pool and shared activities room. At the time of our inspection there were 11 people living at West Banbury Cottages.

At the last inspection, the service was rated Good.

At this inspection we found the service remained Good.

Why the service is rated good:

The service continued to provide safe care to people. One person commented: “Staff keep me safe.” Measures to manage risk were as least restrictive as possible to protect people’s freedom. People’s rights were protected because the service followed the appropriate legal processes. Medicines were safely managed on people’s behalf.

Care files were personalised to reflect people’s personal preferences. Their views and suggestions were taken into account to improve the service. People were supported to maintain a balanced diet, which they enjoyed. Health and social care professionals were regularly involved in people’s care to ensure they received the care and treatment which was right for them.

There were effective staff recruitment and selection processes in place. People received effective care and support from staff who were well trained and competent.

The service was very caring and people had built strong relationships with each other and staff. People engaged in a wide variety of activities and spent time in the local community going to specific places of interest.

Staff spoke positively about communication and how the registered manager worked well with them and encouraged their professional development.

A number of methods were used to assess the quality and safety of the service people received and make continuous improvements.

5 November 2014

During a routine inspection

West Banbury Cottages provides accommodation and personal care for up to 15 young adults with learning disabilities who enjoy an active outdoor lifestyle. The service consists of six cottages with an onsite swimming pool and shared activities room.

This inspection took place on 5 November 2014 and was announced at short notice. The service was first registered with the commission in 2013 and had not been previously inspected. At the time of our inspection there were seven people living at the service.

At the time of our inspection the service did not have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The provider’s nominated individual who had responsibility for supervising the management of this service was performing the role of acting manager and the process of recruiting a new manager was well underway. Staff told us the nominated individual had provided effective leadership to the service and relatives explained that although they had been informed of the changes to the management of the service they had not noticed any impact on the quality of care the service provided.

People told us they were “happy” and indicated they enjoyed living at West Banbury Cottages. We saw people and staff relaxing together and enjoying a variety of activities throughout our inspection. Relatives were pleased with the quality of care provided and one relative said “It’s a nice place, more than I ever thought I would get for (the person)”. Professionals told us they believed the service provided good quality care and explained that people’s relatives had also reported that the care provided was good.

The staff team was well motivated and had been provided with appropriate training and support. We observed staff actively engaging with and encouraging people to join in with activities. Staff told us they enjoyed their work and found it particularly rewarding when they were able to support people to access new experiences. Staff recruitment processes were robust and appropriate pre-employment checks had been completed to ensure people’s safety.

Staff told us “staffing levels are good” and we found staffing levels routinely exceeded those required to meet people’s care needs. People were safe and able to engage in a wide variety of activities both within the service and the local community.

People’s care plans were detailed and contained sufficient information to enable staff to meet people’s care needs. People who used the service and their relatives had been involved in the development of care plans to help ensure they reflected people’s wishes and interests. Relatives told us, “We have been very involved in the care planning” and “we have a sit down with them every three or six months and talk with them about the care records”. Risk assessments provided staff with clear guidance on how to support people appropriately and minimise identified risks.

There were a wide variety of activities available to people at West Banbury Cottages. These included swimming, farm visits, discos and visits to local tourist attractions. When planning activities staff accounted for and respected people likes and preferences.

The staff had worked effectively in partnership with other local care providers and health professionals in order to meet people’s care needs. People’s move to the service had been well managed and staff had developed supportive and caring relationships with people.

The nominated individual was proud of the service and explained that the provider had developed the service specifically to cater for the needs of young adults who enjoyed the outdoors.

Quality assurance processes were effective. Incident and accidents had been appropriately investigated and procedures had been updated as a result of the findings of these investigations.

There were appropriated systems in place for the management and investigation of complaints. The service’s policy documents had been produced in easy to read formats that included the use of pictures and symbols to enable people to access this information.