• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Ado Lodge

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

53 Ramley Road, Lymington, Hampshire, SO41 8GZ (01590) 679089

Provided and run by:
Alo Care Ltd

All Inspections

23 February 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 23 February and 1 March 2017. The inspection was carried out as a result of concerns received about the service.

Ado Lodge is a care home service without nursing, which provides personal care and accommodation for up to four younger adults with learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder.

There were three people using the service at the time of this inspection.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Although there was a registered manager in post they were currently absent from the service. The provider had put in interim management arrangements. The home also employed a home manager. This role was intended to have a lead role in day to day management within the home.

Experienced staff were not always deployed in sufficient numbers to keep people safe.

People were not fully protected from the risk of avoidable harm and abuse that may breach their human rights because staff did not always receive appropriate training in a timely manner.

The system for checking staff’s suitability for their role before they started working at the home was not robust.

Medicines were not all stored, administered and managed safely.

People were not always supported by staff who had received appropriate training, professional development and supervision to enable them to meet people’s individual needs. There were not always enough qualified and experienced staff to respond to and meet people’s needs.

A regular team of staff had developed positive caring relationships with people, knew people well and respected their privacy and dignity.

People's care needs had not been reassessed regularly and this had put them at risk of inconsistent care or not receiving the care and support they needed.

The systems used for recording people’s care and support had changed frequently and had not supported staff to provide individualised or person centred care.

The complaints system was unclear and had been managed inconsistently.

Management systems were not effective in ensuring the quality and safety of the service. Incident reporting systems were not robust.

The registered manager had not promoted a positive, open and inclusive culture at the service. Staff did not receive appropriate support and did not feel well informed.

Services that provide health and social care to people are required to inform the Care Quality Commission (CQC) of important events that happen in relation to the service. The provider had not informed the CQC of a number of significant events.

We found a number of breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 and one breach under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Registration) Regulations 2009.

28 May 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

The inspection was unannounced.

Ado Lodge registered to provide care and support for up to four people and has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service and has the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the law; as does the provider. The home provides care to a variety of adults with different health needs including a learning disability.

Staff were suitably deployed to meet the needs of each person. Healthcare professionals and relatives told us they were satisfied with the number of staff working at each shift.

Staff understood the needs of people and we saw care was provided with kindness and compassion. People, relatives and health and social care professionals told us they were very happy with the care.

Staff were appropriately trained and skilled and provided care in a safe environment. They all received a thorough induction when they started work and fully understood their roles and responsibilities, as well as the values and philosophy of the home. They completed extensive training to ensure the care delivered to people was safe and effective.

The provider had employed skilled staff and took steps to make sure interventions applied were least restrictive and in line with best practice. Healthcare professionals told us they were kept informed when incidents or accidents had occurred.

The registered manager and senior staff assessed and monitored the quality of care consistently involving people, relatives and professionals. Each person and every relative told us they were asked for feedback and encouraged to voice their opinions about the quality of care provided.

There was a culture of respect, kindness and loyalty in the service. Interaction between staff and people was friendly and encouraging. People we spoke with consistently told us they had frequent opportunity to express their views with staff and management. Professionals consistently told us the leadership in the home was good and always displayed strong values when they visited people.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) which applies to care homes. These safeguards protect the rights of people using services by ensuring that if there are any restrictions to their freedom and liberty, these have been authorised by the local authority as being required to protect the person from harm. We observed people’s freedoms were not unlawfully restricted and staff were knowledgeable about when a DoLS application should be made.

Records showed referrals to health care professionals were made quickly when people became unwell. Each health care professional told us the staff were responsive to people’s changing health needs.

Care plans were reviewed regularly and people’s support was personalised and tailored to their individual needs.

The provider had effective systems in place to support people with their medicines safely. Records showed medicines that were no longer needed were disposed of correctly.

27 January 2014

During an inspection in response to concerns

People who used the service understood the care and support choices available to them. We saw evidence that demonstrated that people were provided with suitable information to make decisions about their care.

We looked at the care and support records for one person who used the service and found that an assessment of their needs and care plans, including risk assessments were in place.

During our visit we inspected the storage and records of medicines held in the home. We saw that all medicines were stored in a locked cabinet. This meant that medicines were kept safely.

Appropriate checks were undertaken before care workers began work. We saw evidence that staff were subject to the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks.

Care records including medical appointments were documented and provided accurate information that reflected people's needs.