• Dentist
  • Dentist

Grange Farm Dental Practice

Newhill Place, 27 Singleton Drive, Grange Farm, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK8 0PX (01908) 508704

Provided and run by:
Grange Farm Dental Practice Ltd

All Inspections

23 July 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced focussed inspection on 23 July 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Grange Farm Dental Practice is in Milton Keynes and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking is available near the practice.

The dental team includes three dentists, two GDC registered dental nurses and one trainee dental nurse, two dental hygienists one of whom is employed by the practice. An anaesthetist visits the practice to provide conscious sedation to patients. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a company and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the CQC as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Grange Farm Dental Practice is the principal dentist.

During the inspection we spoke with two dentists, three dental nurses, one dental hygienist, and the anaesthetist who provides sedation at the practice. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday to Friday from 9am to 5pm and alternate Saturdays.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff although there was no evidence that fixed wiring testing had been completed within 5 years.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation. However, we found that the policy had not always been followed, as not all staff records we reviewed had satisfactory evidence of conduct in previous employment (references) or a Disclosure and Barring Service checks (DBS) completed at the time of employment.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The provider had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement an effective recruitment procedure to ensure that appropriate checks are completed prior to new staff commencing employment at the practice. In particular ensuring satisfactory evidence of conduct in previous employment (references) is sought for newly recruited staff in line with the practice’s recruitment policy.

  • Take action to implement all recommendations in the practice's legionella risk assessment, taking into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health in the Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, and having regard to The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance.

  • Take action to ensure audits of radiography, and infection prevention and control are undertaken at regular intervals to improve the quality of the service. The practice should also ensure that, where appropriate, audits have documented learning points and the resulting improvements can be demonstrated.

  • Implement an effective system for receiving and responding to patient safety alerts, recalls and rapid response reports issued by by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, the Central Alerting System and other relevant bodies, such as Public Health England.

21 January 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with one person who used the service. This person told us that they had previously had a fear of visiting dentists but they found this dentist to be "very good". The person told us that they liked the way the dentist dealt with them and had given them an opportunity to discuss their previous dental experiences which had caused some anxiety. The person told us that they were given treatment options if they were required and with support from the dental team they made a decision about what treatment they wished to receive. They also told us that they felt the practice was clean and "immaculate".

We found that appropriate arrangements were in place to deal with consent, and people's treatment plans reflected the treatment they received. We found there was guidance in place around infection control and appropriate checks were completed on staff backgrounds to ensure they were suitable for their role. We also found that the provider had an appropriate system in place to monitor the quality provisions that the service offered.