The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Claremont Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Medical Centre, 2 Cookham Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 8AN (01628) 624469

Provided and run by:
Claremont Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Claremont Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Claremont Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

28 November 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Claremont Surgery, also known as Claremont & Holyport Practice, on 28 November 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed through audits, benchmarking and learning from feedback.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients reported through comment cards they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns. The practice proactively recorded informal complaints to identify trends that could help improve the service.
  • Appointments were available to meet the needs of the local population. This included early morning, evening and telephone appointments and weekend appointments through participation in a local seven-day access scheme.
  • There was a clear leadership structure that supported staff to develop professionally and valued contribution, suggestions and innovation. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

We saw one area of outstanding practice:

  • Extensive in-house services were available for patients who experienced substance misuse. This included weekly GP-led opiate substitute prescribing clinics and nurse-led bloodborne virus clinics. Clinical staff had undertaken specialist training to provide services.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice