• Doctor
  • GP practice

South Wigston Health Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

80 Blaby Road, Wigston, Leicestershire, LE18 4SE (0116) 278 2028

Provided and run by:
South Wigston Health Centre

Important:

This report provides findings of an inspection at a time when a new provider was providing services from the location. More information can be found in the body of the report.

All Inspections

31/05/2023

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection at South Wigston Health Centre on 31 May 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as Good.

At our previous inspection in November 2022, the practice was rated as inadequate overall and inadequate for the key questions of safe, effective, responsive and well-led. The key question of caring was rated as requires improvement. The service was not placed into special measures, as the service was not registered with the Care Quality Commission at the time of the last inspection. Therefore we were not able to use our enforcement powers.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for South Wigston Health Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection.

This inspection in May 2023 was a comprehensive inspection including a site visit to review progress with the action plan the provider had sent us following the last inspection, and to ensure improvements had been made.

Following this inspection, the practice is now rated as good overall and for the key questions of effective, caring, responsive and well led and requires improvement for safe.

How we carried out the inspection.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting specific evidence from the provider to be submitted electronically. Other evidence was reviewed during the site visit.
  • Staff questionnaires
  • A site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • Significant work had been completed to address the concerns we identified during our last inspection in November 2022.
  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm however there was some areas that needed improving.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Complete the collation of staff immunisation status.
  • Implement systems to ensure all safety alerts are received and acted upon appropriately, including the reviews of historic medicines alerts.
  • Continue to promote the uptake of cervical screening and achieve the 80% uptake national target.
  • Continue to develop systems to improve patient experience for telephone access.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

15 and 23 November 2022

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection at South Wigston Health Centre on 15 and 23 November 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Inadequate.

At our previous inspection on June 2017, the practice was rated Good overall for the 5 key questions of safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for South Wigston Health Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection.

This inspection in November 2022 was a comprehensive inspection including a site visit to follow up on concerns raised with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). We found that the practice was not correctly registered with the CQC in that previous partners had left, but remained registered as the provider of the service. An application to remove the old partners and add new partners as part of the same provider was in progress at the time of the inspection. We decided to undertake the inspection due to the potential risk to patients arising from the concerns we had received.

The key questions of safe, effective, responsive and well-led and the overall rating are now rated as inadequate. Caring is now rated as requires improvement.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic the CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
  • Completing remote clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider to be submitted electronically
  • A short site visit

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Inadequate overall

We found that:

  • The practice did not ensure care and treatment was provided in a safe way to patients.
  • The practice had not established effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • The service was not provided in a way to care and respond to patient’s needs.

Our findings were shared with the Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care Board (LLRICB) which contracts primary care services from GP practice providers. CQC registration is a requirement of all NHS-led GP contract holders.

Following our inspection, we received assurance that the new partners had developed a comprehensive action in conjunction with LLRICB to deliver sustainable improvements.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

16 June 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at South Wigston Health Centre on 31 January 2017. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. The full comprehensive report on the Month Year inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for South Wigston Health Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

We found that the practice to require improvement in the safe, effective, responsive and well led key questions. It was rated as good for the caring key question.

Specifically we found that the practice must;

  • Implement governance arrangements to ensure appropriate systems are in place for assessing and monitoring the quality of services provided. For example, maintenance of the cold chain and review of temperature monitoring of the refrigerators used to store vaccines and the authorisations for staff to administer medicines.

  • Improve the process in place to ensure staff training is monitored and all staff are up to date with mandatory training appropriate to their role.

  • Ensure there are formal governance arrangements in place including systems for assessing and monitoring risks and the quality of the service provision.

  • Gather patient views and experiences to ensure the services provided reflect the needs of the population served and ensure flexibility, choice and continuity of care.

  • Develop ways to monitor impact and improve patient satisfaction with particular regard to phone access and routine appointments.
  • Ensure that oxygen cylinder to be used in an emergency was below the recommended level.

We issued the practice with a Warning Notice for breaches of Regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Good Governance.

We also issued the practice with an Improvement Notice for breaches of Regulation 12 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Safe care and treatment.

In addition we found that the practice should;

  • Ensure sharps bins are assembled, signed, dated and replaced as per national guidance.
  • Review and develop the current systems in place to ensure all clinicians are kept up to date with national guidance and guidelines.
  • Improve the process for clinical meeting minutes to include audits and updates on NICE guidance.
  • Ensure policies and procedures include information such as date, date of review and name of responsible person.
  • Review the current processes in place for the recording and reporting of themes and trends from significant events and complaints.
  • Re-introduce the use of special patient notes.

This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 16 June 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 31 January 2017. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice is now rated as ‘Good’.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • There was effective management of medicines requiring refrigeration.

  • All staff were up to date with mandatory training appropriate to their role.

  • There were formal governance arrangements in place to monitor risks and the quality of the service provision.

  • There was an effective process to ensure that oxygen for use in medical emergencies was monitored and available for use.

  • The practice continued to gather patient views and experiences on the quality of the services provided.

  • The practice had responded to concerns regarding telephone access and the availability of appointments.
  • Sharps bins were used in accordance with national guidance.
  • There were systems in place to ensure all clinicians were kept up to date with national guidance and guidelines.
  • Clinical meeting minutes showed that audits and updates on NICE guidance were discussed.
  • Policies had been reviewed, dated and included the name of the person responsible for that policy.
  • There was a system in place for the recording and reporting of themes and trends from significant events and complaints.
  • Special patient notes had been re-introduced.

However, there was an area of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

The provider should:

Continue to monitor, audit and improve patient satisfaction with telephone access and appointment availability.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

31 January 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at South Wigston Health Centre on 22 April 2015. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. The full comprehensive report on the April 2015 report can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for South Wigston Health Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced comprehensive carried out on 31 January 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 22 April 2015. This report will cover all the five key questions and include our findings in relation to those requirements and additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Following the most recent inspection we found that overall the practice was still rated as requires improvement. We acknowledged that improvements had been made but further work was required.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was a system in place for reporting and recording significant events. Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded and reviewed although this was not always in depth so that learning could be maximised.
  • At this recent inspection we found that risks to patients were now well assessed. However we found that some processes for the management of risks to patients and others against inappropriate or unsafe care were not effective. For example, maintenance of the cold chain and review of temperature monitoring of the refrigerators used to store vaccines, patient specific directions and some areas of infection control.

  • Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Data showed patient outcomes were above local and national average.
  • Clinical audits had been carried out but further information was required to evidence the improvements to patient outcomes and shared learning with the practice team.
  • Patients were positive about their interactions with staff and said they were treated with compassion dignity and respect.

  • 95% of patients who responded to the national patient survey in July 2016 had confidence and trust in the last GP they saw. Only 39% of patients said they could get through easily to the practice by phone compared to the CCG average of 67% and national average of 73%. This was 20% worse than the results from the January 2015 survey.
  • Comments cards we reviewed and patients we spoke with told us that the appointment systems were not working well. They did not find it easy to make an appointment with a named GP but urgent appointments were available the same day.

  • The national patient survey results had not been reviewed and actions put in place to improve the areas of concerns identified by the patients registered at the practice.

  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • There was a leadership structure in place and staff felt supported by management.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.
  • The governance framework currently in place to support the delivery of strategy and good quality care need to be reviewed.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Implement governance arrangements to ensure appropriate systems are in place for assessing and monitoring the quality of services provided. For example, maintenance of the cold chain and review of temperature monitoring of the refrigerators used to store vaccines, authorisations for staff to administer medicines and some areas of infection control. Improve the process in place to ensure staff training is monitored and all staff are up to date with mandatory training appropriate to their role.

  • Ensure there are formal governance arrangements in place including systems for assessing and monitoring risks and the quality of the service provision. Gather patient views and experiences to ensure the services provided reflect the needs of the population served and ensure flexibility, choice and continuity of care.

  • Develop ways to monitor impact and improve patient satisfaction with particular regard to phone access and routine appointments.

In addition the provider should:

  • Ensure sharps bins are assembled, signed, dated and replaced as per national guidance.
  • Monitor the triage call back system to evidence the prioritisation of clinical need.
  • Review and develop the current systems in place to ensure all clinicians are kept up to date with national guidance and guidelines.
  • Improve the process for clinical meeting minutes to include audits and updates on NICE guidance.
  • Ensure there is information for carers available in the practice.
  • Ensure policies and procedures include information such as date, date of review and name of responsible person.
  • Put an action plan in place in response to information from the national patient survey, East Leicestershire and Rutland CCG listening booth comments.
  • Review the current processes in place for the recording and reporting of themes and trends from significant events and complaints, review of safeguarding registers and the use of special patient notes.

The service will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action. Another inspection will be conducted within a further six months, and if there is not enough improvement we will move to close the service by adopting our proposal to remove this location or cancel the provider’s registration.

In addition to this I have issued a warning notice to the practice in regard to Regulation 17 Good Governance which the practice will have had to comply with by 5 May 2017.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

22 April 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at South Wigston Medical Centre on 22 April 2015. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Specifically, we found the practice requires improvement for providing safe, responsive and well led services. It was providing an effective and caring service.

It also required improvement for providing services for all the population groups

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. However there was scope to ensure that learning was disseminated more formally.
  • 76.% of patients who responded to the national patient  survey said they recommend the surgery to others. 80% described their overall experience as good.
  • Risks to patients were not assessed and well managed.
  • Some audits had been carried out but we saw no evidence that audits were driving improvement in performance to improve patient outcomes.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • The practice had a number of policies and procedures to govern activity, but these were over five years old and had not been reviewed since. The practice did not hold regular governance meetings and issues were discussed at ad hoc meetings.
  • Some staff that we spoke with on the day of the inspection said that there were not enough staff to maintain the smooth running of the practice, for example, not enough nurses to keep the clinics running in line with patient needs.
  • Urgent appointments were usually available on the day they were requested. However patients said that they had to wait a long time to get through by phone and get an appointment. The practice had recognised a lack of patient satisfaction around access to appointments and telephone access to the practice and were taking action to address this.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure there is a robust system to manage and learn from significant events, near misses and complaints.
  • Implement a robust system to ensure that National Patient Safety Alerts and Medical Healthcare Product alerts are disseminated to staff and that action is taken as necessary.
  • Identify, assess and manage risks relating to the health, welfare and safety of patients, staff and other people who may be at risk within the practice. For example, risk assessments for, legionella, general office environment, disclosure and barring (DBS) and control of substances hazardous to health (COSHH), infection control and fire safety.
  • Implement effective systems for the management of risks to patients and others against inappropriate or unsafe care. This should include the checking of medical equipment and disclosure and barring checks for newly recruited staff.
  • Ensure that staff have appropriate support, identified through a formal appraisal system to enable them to deliver the care and work they carry out in the practice.
  • Ensure training records are maintained and available.
  • Ensure staff have appropriate and up to date policies and guidance to carry out their roles in a safe and effective manner.

In addition the provider should

  • Ensure all staff are aware that National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines are available on the practice intranet.
  • Ensure there is an up to date business continuity plan which includes risks and mitigating actions.
  • Have a robust system in place to track prescription pads.
  • Consider gaining patient views in the delivery of service and driving improvements. For example, the appointment system.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice