• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: St Catherine Care Home

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

19-21 St Catherines Road, Bitterne Park, Southampton, Hampshire, SO18 1LL (023) 8067 2626

Provided and run by:
Chilworth Care Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile
Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

3,5 & 16 June 2015

During a routine inspection

This Inspection took place on 3, 5 and 16 June 2015 and was unannounced. St Catherine Care Home provides accommodation and care for up to 14 older people with mental health needs or people living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 11 people living at the home.

The home had a registered manager who had been registered since December 2012. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.’

We found people’s safety was compromised in some areas. Infection control practices were not always adhered to. The handrail in the downstairs bathroom was rusty, flooring was badly stained in some areas, and some rooms were in need of redecoration. This presented a potential infection control risk to people.

People were supported to receive their medicines safely from suitably trained staff. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs. Relent checks were conducted before staff started working at St Catherine’s to make sure staff were of good character and had the necessary skills to look after people safely. Staff received regular supervision and support where they could discuss their training and development needs.

People felt safe. There were systems in place to ensure the risks to people’s safety and wellbeing were identified and addressed. Staff had received training in safeguarding adults and knew how to identify, prevent and report abuse.

People had positive relations with the staff and were confident in the home. People who used the service spoke positively about the care they received and told us their needs were met. Care plans were personalised and provided comprehensive information about how people wished to receive care and support. This helped ensure people received personalised care in a way that met individual needs.

Staff sought consent from people before providing care or support. The ability of people to make decisions was assessed in line with legal requirements to ensure their liberty was not restricted unlawfully. Decisions were taken in the best interests of people. Staff showed a understanding of this legislation.

People received appropriate support to eat and drink and were offered a choice of nutritious meals. Staff were aware of people’s likes and dislikes and offered alternatives if people did not want the menu of the day.

People were cared for with kindness, compassion and sensitivity. Staff members knew about people’s lives and backgrounds and used this information to support them effectively.

People were supported by health professionals and staff knew how to access specialist services for people. People told us that they knew the person well and were aware of their needs.

People liked living at the home and felt it was well-led. Quality systems were not always effective in driving improvements within the home; actions that were outstanding were not followed up. There was an open and transparent culture at the home. There were appropriate management arrangements in place. Staff and people were encouraged to talk to the manager about any concerns.

The home did not support people living with dementia to navigate their way around the home. We have made a recommendation about creating suitable environments that support people living with dementia.

13 November 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with five out of 13 people who were using the service at the time of our inspection. They were satisfied with the care and support provided. One told us, 'They look after me properly. I have no complaints at all.' Another said, 'Everything is fine, and if it wasn't they would soon hear about it.' People told us they had agreed to their care plans and that staff made sure they had their agreement before they delivered personal care. They said staff helped them with their medicines and made sure they took them all.

A family member who was visiting their relation told us they were happy with the care and support provided. The service had assessed their relative's needs and produced a care plan which met their needs. Everything was done with the person's consent and agreement.

We spoke with staff, reviewed records and observed the care and support people received. We found care and support were provided with people's consent. Staff were informed about processes to follow if people could not consent to their care. The service provided effective support that was caring and responsive to people's needs. Procedures were followed to protect people from risks associated with the management of medicines.

People's care records and other records to do with the management of the service were fit for purpose. Records were kept securely and available when required.