• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Warwick Square Group Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Grosvenor House Surgery, Warwick Square, Carlisle, Cumbria, CA1 1LB (01228) 536561

Provided and run by:
Warwick Square Group Practice

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

26 July 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Warwick Square Group Practice on 26 July 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

31 July 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Drs. Wigmore and Kari on 10 May 2016. The overall rating for the practice was good, although the practice was rated as requires improvement for safety. The full comprehensive report on the May 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Drs. Wigmore and Kari on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 31 July 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breach in regulation that we identified in our previous inspection on 10 May 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

The practice is now rated as good for safe services, and overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • The practice had taken action to address the concerns raised at the CQC inspection in May 2016. They had put measures in place to ensure they were compliant with regulations.
  • Appropriate arrangements were now in place for undertaking suitable pre-employment checks.
  • The practice had a pre-employment checklist to ensure references were obtained for permanent and locum GPs and relevant qualifications were checked.
  • Recommendations made at the previous inspection, such as infection control audits to be carried out more regularly, had been actioned.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

10 May 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Drs. Wigmore and Kari on 10 May 2016. Overall, the practice is rated as good.

(Prior to October 2015, three separate GP practices were based at the Grosvenor House Surgery premises and there was separate National GP Patient Survey and Quality and Outcome Framework (QOF) data for each one. In October 2015, Drs. Wigmore and Kari became the only practice to be based at the surgery and they took on the responsibility for providing care and treatment to patients previously registered with the other two practices. As there is only one registered provider, Drs. Wigmore and Kari, the current registration is correct. Although the most recent publicly available information (i.e. the QOF data for 2014/15 and National GP Patient Survey, published in January 2016) covered a period of time when it was available for each separate practice, the Care Quality Commission has only populated this report with the data that relates to the current provider, Drs. Wigmore and Kari.)

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a good system for reporting, recording and learning from significant events

  • Most risks to patients and staff were assessed and well managed.

  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance.

  • Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.

  • Services were planned and delivered to take into account the needs of different patient groups and to provide flexibility, choice and continuity of care.

  • Services were tailored to meet the needs of individual patients and were delivered in a way that ensured flexibility, choice and continuity of care. All staff were actively engaged in monitoring and improving quality and patient outcomes. Staff were committed to supporting patients to live healthier lives through a targeted and proactive approach to health promotion.

  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and that they were involved in decisions about their treatment.

  • Overall, the main practice site had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs. The branch surgery premises were satisfactory and steps were being taken to improve them.

  • The practice had a clear vision and strategy and staff were actively taking steps to deliver the improvements set out in their business development plan. .

The area where the provider must make improvement is:

  • Carry out the required employment checks for all staff employed by the practice.

However, there were also areas where the provider needs to make improvements. The provider should:

  • Introduce a formal system for updating the practice’s clinical guidelines.

  • Provide a defibrillator at the branch surgery, and provide non-clinical staff with annual training in basic life support.

  • Carry out an annual comprehensive infection control audit.

  • Hold regular clinical meetings.

  • Complete outstanding staff appraisals.

  • Improve access at the entrance to the main practice for patients with disabilities.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

23 May 2013

During a routine inspection

The practice declared non compliance against regulations 9, 14 and 15 on registration. We inspected the practice at this time to see if they were now compliant with the regulations.

There was a practice leaflet and a practice web site which included information regarding the services that were provided in the practice, how to access out of hours care, confidentiality, access to the building and informed patients how they could complain if they wished. The surgery waiting room was set up in such a way to give a patient as much privacy as possible when talking to staff at reception. One patient we spoke to told us that, 'I find the practice helpful and informative.' All of the patients we spoke with confirmed that they felt confident that the doctor understood their condition.

All of the people we spoke with told us that staff always asked for consent before they undertook any treatment or procedure. The practice had a 'buddy' system between the GP's. This ensured that there was an element of continuity in care if the GP they were registered with was on leave. One patient we spoke with told us; 'It is always very easy to get an appointment when you need one.' The practice participated in the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QoF) system which is an incentive scheme for GP practices in the UK, which rewards practices for the provision of 'quality care'.