The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Wrose Health Centre Also known as Rockwell and Wrose Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Kings Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD2 1QG (01274) 638353

Provided and run by:
The Rockwell and Wrose Practice

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Wrose Health Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Wrose Health Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

7 October 2019

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an inspection of Wrose Health Centre on 7 October 2019. This was due to the length of time since the last inspection. Following our review of the information available to us, including information provided by the practice, we focused our inspection on the following key questions:

  • Are services effective and well led?

Because of the assurance received from our review of information we carried forward the good ratings for the following key questions:

  • Are services safe, caring and responsive?

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

• what we found when we inspected

• information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and

• information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall and good for all population groups.

We found that:

  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs and was delivered in line with current legislation and evidence-based guidance.
  • There were clear responsibilities, roles and systems of accountability to support good governance.
  • Feedback from patients was positive about the friendliness and helpfulness of all staff at the practice. An active patient group contributed to ideas to improve the patient experience.
  • The provider had worked with patients to knit blankets and scarves as gifts for vulnerable patients to promote their caring ethos and kindness for others.
  • Clinical staff gave patients time to be involved in their care and treatment decisions.
  • The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care, with a focus on education and learning.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Continue with efforts to review and improve the uptake of childhood immunisations and rates of cervical screening for eligible women.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

3 February 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced inspection at Wrose Health Centre and Rockwell Medical Centre on 3 February 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Specifically, we found the practice to be good for providing safe, well-led, effective, caring and responsive services. It was also good for providing services for older people, people with long term conditions, families, children and young people and the working age population.

Our key findings across all the population group areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and managed, including those relating to recruitment checks.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Complaints would be addressed in a timely manner and the practice endeavoured to resolve complaints to a satisfactory conclusion.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice